1
   

California Wins 1st Anti-Spam Judgement

 
 
Reply Sat 25 Oct, 2003 06:02 am
When I first read this, I didn't know whether to make this a discrete topic, or post it under the, "What Made You Smile Today, thread.

Quote:
California Wins Its First Anti-Spam Judgment
Fri Oct 24, 6:30 PM ET
By Barbara Grady

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California won its first anti-spam judgment on Friday when a court fined a marketing firm $2 million for sending out millions of unsolicited e-mails telling people how to spam, the state's attorney general said.

Attorney General Bill Lockyer brought the case against PW Marketing of Los Angeles County and its owners Paul Willis and Claudia Griffin in 2002 under a 1998 state anti-spam law. The law was strengthened last month to make it easier to sue spammers.

Lockyer's spokesman Tom Dressler said while this case was decided under the original statute, the attorney general's office expects in the future it will be easier to try cases under the updated, tougher law.

PW Marketing and Willis and Griffin were charged with sending out millions of e-mails advertising "how to" guides on spamming and long lists of e-mail addresses.

The judgment, which Lockyer said will be the model for future spam injunctions, forbids PW Marketing from sending unsolicited commercial e-mail, accessing computers that belong to other people without their permission and disguising its identity by sending e-mails that appear to originate from a different address.

The injunction also forbids Willis and Griffin for 10 years from owning or managing any business that advertises over the Internet.

The tougher measures in the new statute include allowing individuals to sue spammers and collect damages of up to $1,000 per e-mail. Another provision forbids sending unsolicited e-mail advertisements unless recipients give prior permission to receive such e-mails. The old law made it illegal to send to recipients who had specified they did not want to receive e-mail advertising. It also required senders to provide a phone number or valid e-mail address for opting out on each e-mail -- something the company did not do, the attorney general's office said.


I think that it is about time that spammers get hit hard where it hurts.....in their pocketbook! What do you all think?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 589 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Oct, 2003 06:06 am
this is definitely a smile-maker, Phoenix.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Sat 25 Oct, 2003 06:08 am
ehBeth wrote:
this is definitely a smile-maker, Phoenix.


I'm with ehBeth on this one.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Mon 27 Oct, 2003 05:12 pm
shove it to'em
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

YouTube Is Doomed - Discussion by Shapeless
So I just joined Facebook.... - Discussion by DrewDad
Internet disinformation overload - Discussion by rosborne979
Participatory Democracy Online - Discussion by wandeljw
OpenDNS and net neutrality - Question by Butrflynet
Internet Explorer 8? - Question by Pitter
 
  1. Forums
  2. » California Wins 1st Anti-Spam Judgement
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 03:27:31