7
   

the gap between rich people and poor people

 
 
Adverb
 
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 07:26 am
some people think that the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between rich people and poor people. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of view. What is your opinion?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 7 • Views: 5,133 • Replies: 16
No top replies

 
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 07:27 am
@Adverb,
Is there a gap?
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 07:30 am
@Miller,
Are you rich because the poor can see the gap .
Miller
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 07:42 am
@Ionus,

Ionus wrote:

Are you rich because the poor can see the gap .



Tell me something...Why are there more TVs , computers and cell phones per household than there are indoor toilets?
aidan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 08:13 am
@Adverb,
My first reaction is to say that I think technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor if you look at it and compare the standard of living between developed vs. third world countries.

When you look at rich and poor within the same developed country though, my impression is that technology is closing the gap in terms of the standard and activities of the routine day to day life they live.
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 11:07 am
the rich are different.
they have more money.
f scott fitzgerald
djjd62
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 11:23 am
@Miller,
Miller wrote:


Ionus wrote:

Are you rich because the poor can see the gap .



Tell me something...Why are there more TVs , computers and cell phones per household than there are indoor toilets?


how many indoor toilets do you need?, 1 should be sufficient

now, if you're talking worldwide, that has more to do with infrastructure than anything

easier to get tv's computers and cellphones with credit, givin the credit card debt in north america, id bet that most of that technology is owned by most folks in name only
0 Replies
 
Green Witch
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 11:23 am
@Ionus,
No, she's a Conservative Republican.
0 Replies
 
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 04:23 pm
The real gap between the rich and poor is the former's ability to get adequate health care to sustain a healthy productive life despite their health problems.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 04:32 pm
@Miller,
Quote:
Why are there more TVs , computers and cell phones per household than there are indoor toilets?
Because we use them more often for longer. They are also presented as desirable.
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 04:35 pm
@Adverb,
The problem is simple. If the poor spent more money then their lives would be better. Sometimes when I am depressed I go and buy a new mercedes. That always cheers me up. If the poor would only do the same, I am sure they would feel better.
0 Replies
 
hamburgboy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 04:39 pm
@Miller,
miller wrote :

Quote:
Tell me something...Why are there more TVs , computers and cell phones per household than there are indoor toilets?


have you asked what the cost of installing indoor plumbing is ?
perhaps we need to ask the chinese to install our indoor plumbing - might see the price come down .
kuvasz
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Nov, 2009 04:52 pm
@chai2,
chai said
Quote:
the rich are different.
they have more money.
f scott fitzgerald


That is a misrepresentaion of the quote that diminishes completely and distorts beyond recognition the intention of what Fitzgerald was intent describing.

It has nothing to do with wealth; it has everything to do with what wealth does to a person.

Quote:
Let me tell you about the very rich. They are different from you and me. They possess and enjoy early, and it does something to them, makes them soft where we are hard, and cynical where we are trustful, in a way that, unless you were born rich, it is very difficult to understand. They think, deep in their hearts, that they are better than we are because we had to discover the compensations and refuges of life for ourselves. Even when they enter deep into our world or sink below us, they still think that they are better than we are. They are different.

-F. Scott Fitzgerald, The Rich Boy, All the Sad Young Men
0 Replies
 
Adverb
 
  1  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2009 06:46 am
@hamburgboy,
You have prejudice against Chinese?
Come to China and take a look, I think you should take back what you just said.
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Wed 25 Nov, 2009 07:04 am
@Adverb,
hamburgboy was not making fun of the chinese, he was saying that goods produced in china are much less expensive than in north america, there are very reasons for this, but they are best left for the political thread
Miller
 
  1  
Reply Fri 2 Apr, 2010 08:59 am
@djjd62,
Will there ever be a Middle Class, again?
0 Replies
 
Pamela Rosa
 
  1  
Reply Sun 31 Oct, 2010 01:21 am
Quote:
The rich are different. They have more money - f scott fitzgerald

and more DHEAS

Quote:
People who are rich have more of key hormone so are likely to live longer, study suggests.
DHEAS - or dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate - is produced by the brain, adrenal glands and sexual organs and is a guide to life expectancy.

Researchers from University College London, working on the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, found evidence that biological ageing is slower among people with better socio-economic circumstances.

It found that the wealthier people were, the higher their levels of DHEAS.

The discovery raises the possibility that the hormone could be artificially produced and used to make people live longer.

The scientists also found that those with higher levels of it tended to do greater amounts of exercise, lead a more active life with lots of pastimes, and have more friends and family.

Production of it is greatest during childhood and the teenage years, before it gradually declines through adult life - by the age of 80 it could be just 10 per cent of the peak level of teenagers.

Having more DHEAS in the body is linked to a better memory and ability to cope with mental tasks, particularly in men.

The research also found higher levels of a second hormone - growth factor I (IGF-I) - in those who are wealthier.

Separately, the same study found that the amount of money that older people spend on essential items such as food and fuel has "increased significantly" during the past five years.

A quarter of households aged over 50 in England saw a jump of 10% or more in the amount they spent on basic items between 2004/05 and 2008/09, with spending on domestic fuel soaring by a third in real terms.

Unsurprisingly, the poorest households have been most affected by the rising cost of living, according to the ELSA.

Professor Sir Michael Marmot, of UCL's Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, said: "Food and fuel make up a considerable proportion of elderly people's budgets so any price increases tend to have a significant effect on those households.

"Spending on basics as a percentage of income can be used as a yardstick for welfare and the report shows that the poorest fifth of the population were 17 percentage points more likely to experience a substantial increase in the share of their income devoted to basics over this period than the richest fifth of the population."

Despite the recession, that was beginning at the time the data was collected, there was an increase in the number of people aged between 55 and 69 who were working, particularly among those who were working part-time.

People were most likely to retire early due to poor health, or because they were wealthy and belonged to a defined benefit pension scheme.

Older people were more likely to work on beyond the state pension age if they had higher educational qualifications, were in good health or had a partner who was also in work.

The study also found there had been a rise in sedentary behaviour among those aged over 50, with a marked increase in both waist size and weight since the research was last carried out.

Less wealthy people were also likely to have higher levels of obesity, were more likely to smoke, while they took less exercise and ate less fruit and vegetables than those who were better off. They were also more likely to suffer from hypertension and diabetes.

Around 43% of women from the poorest fifth of households were obese, compared with only 28% among the wealthiest fifth, while only 39% of men in the bottom fifth of households ate five portions of fruit or vegetables a day, compared with 61% among the richest fifth.

Work disabilities were also found to be most common among people from poorer backgrounds and those with lower levels of education, while they were particularly common among men in the North East and Yorkshire and the Humber.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8077779/Hormone-research-suggests-rich-live-longer.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/8077779/Hormone-research-suggests-rich-live-longer.html



0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Who or What is Responsible? - Discussion by Merry Andrew
Debt ceiling? - Question by Buffalo
The Legacy of the Reagan Revolution - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Let it crash - Discussion by FreeDuck
No real limits to growth - Discussion by gungasnake
Sovereign debt - Question by JohnJD
Wage discrimination - Question by zewittykitty
Central Bank Operations? - Question by NewToEcons
Frictional unemployment vs structural - Question by MateuszJanczura
 
  1. Forums
  2. » the gap between rich people and poor people
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/25/2024 at 02:42:41