the first post in this thread was from Time
here's some more from Suvudu (Random House)
Challenged and Banned: Flowers for Algernon
Challenged/Banned Info:
• Banned in Emporium, PA, due to sexually explicit passages that parents feared would awaken their children’s “natural impulses.” 1977
• Challenged in Oberlin, OH, due to sexually explicit passages. 1984
• Banned in Glen Rose, AR, due to language and sexually explicit passages. Objectors compared Flowers for Algernon to “books in plastic covers you see at newsstands.” 1981
• Challenged in Glenrock, WY for sexually explicit passages and language. Objector compared the novel to Playboy and Hustler among other, um, photo-centric publications. 1984
• Challenged in Plant City, FL, (and Arizona, Virginia, and Georgia) for sexually explicit passages, adult themes, and profanity. 1976, 1981, 1996, 1997
• Banned from Aledo (Texas) Middle School, subsequently re-shelved at the school library, but not reinstated into the curriculum. 1999
• Frequently challenged due to objections to “sexually explicit” content.
• Ranks no. 47 on ALA’s 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-2000.
Looking at that list above, how many of you out there are thinking: “Flowers for Algernon? Seriously?”
Surprise, I’m serious!
Flowers for Algernon was originally published in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction and concerns itself with the thoughts of Charlie Gordon. Charlie is mentally-disabled man who works as a janitor and lives a pretty simple life. But it isn’t a “content” life. Charlie wants to be smarter, and in this way he is knowledgeable of his differences from other people. What he doesn’t realize, and what so many readers don’t initially recognize, is that his mental-disability colors the way in which he perceives the world around him.
That is to say, to rip-off twist the popular Spider-Man tag: With greater intelligence comes greater awareness. Charlie, and the reader, will come to find out exactly what that means.
So where's the Sci-Fi? Charlie is offered the chance to undergo a series of treatments that have been designed to increase intelligence. The treatments have been successfully completed on a mouse named Algernon and Charlie represents the human guinea pig of the test trials. As the book is told through Charlie's journal entries, we see his IQ grow as his entries become better composed and express more complex thoughts. Unfortunately, things aren't as easy as suddenly being smarter and well-liked. Charlie starts to re-examine everything he thought he knew before. He is aware now of abuses, veiled insults, and so on, and many of his relationships are strained or broken as a direct result of his growing intelligence.
It's sad stuff, to be sure, and Flowers for Algernon has been pulling at people's heartstrings for quite some time now (40+ years). But not all heartstrings are willing to be pulled. Some want to pull Flowers for Algernon in return...right off the shelf and into the nearest trash can, that is.
Unlike some other challenged and banned books, you'll have to actually go looking for the passages in Flowers that continually set the censors off. They just aren't very big and, in context with the novel, they aren't very lurid or overly erotic. More than any other theme, Flowers for Algernon is frequently hit for being too sexually explicit, meaning censors are zeroing in on Charlie's growing awareness of his attraction to Alice, his fling-relationship with Fay, or an incredibly brief passage about an incident early in Charlie's life when he is sent away.
The longest of these involves Alice, Charlie's big-love. There are a couple of paragraphs that deal with their first time together, Charlie also comes to write that sex without love is an incomplete endeavor. It's a scary thought, right? And what about those couple of paragraphs? Are they dirty, filthy, steam-up-the-windows, make-a-sailor-blush prose? Yeah, not so much. By that point in the novel Charlie is considerably more introspective in nature and, while you're not going to go into the scene unaware of what is happening, it's hardly the stuff that's going to, oh say, "awaken natural impulses" in Charlie's readers. Regardless, these elements beyond any other cause Flowers for Algernon to face challenge after challenge more than any other piece of text or thought in the novel.
It's too bad. Daniel Keyes' book addresses several other points that make the book worthwhile reading; lessons like forgiveness, the universal nature of struggles for love and friendship, and the ideas of self-acceptance and tolerance. Hmmm...dangerous stuff there.
If you haven't already, or if it's been a while, you really should pick up this "offensive" book and give it a read. Like Charlie, you might just see the world afterward with new eyes.
Challenged and Banned: A Wrinkle in Time
Challenged/Banned Info:
• Challenged at the Polk City, Fla. Elementary School under allegations that the story promotes witchcraft, crystal balls, and demons. (1985)
• Challenged in the Anniston Ala. schools under objection to the book’s use of the name of Jesus Christ in relations to other artists, philosophers, scientists, and religious leaders (1990)
• Frequently challenged for “undermining religious beliefs.”
• Ranked no. 22 in the ALA’s 100 most banned books for 1990-2000.
A Wrinkle in Time is the first story of a series about the Murry and O’Keefe families. The book is actually what you might call Science Fantasy; it uses the idea of an additional dimension that acts to bend or fold time and space to allow for rapid travel, called tessering. In a nutshell, Meg Murry, the eldest Murry sibling who is pretty unhappy when the book opens, her youngest brother Charles, and one of Meg’s schoolmates, Calvin O’Keefe, are transported into space by disguised beings who are engaged in a war against a cloud that is the physical manifestation of evil. Of course, Meg, Charles, and Calvin are about to be drawn into the middle of things. Eventually, Meg will have to rescue her younger brother and her father, before everyone is returned home.
Looking at this book’s resume, it’d be hard to identify it as a banned or challenged book. A Wrinkle in Time has been awarded the Newbery Medal, Sequoyah Book Award, and Lewis Carroll Shelf Award, and was runner-up for the Hans Christian Andersen Award. Certainly something that decorated wouldn’t be challenged right? Well, no (obviously, or we wouldn’t be here).
A Wrinkle in Time has enough fantastic elements in it to make people nervous, add to that the inclusion of a religious figure (Jesus) in a story that involves elements not normally associated with said religious figure (time travel and alternate dimensions and such) and you've got a book that's going to keep things interesting in many a PTA meeting. We can say this, because that is exactly what has consistently happened to this title. However, given the lessons that Meg learns at the end of the story, and the way in which she learns she can save her brother (it involves love - GASP!) as well as the context in which some other frequently challenged elements are employed, you have to wonder if the objectors have actually read the book at all.
Actually, it's almost fitting, considering the title's history. Madeleine L'Engle collected some 26 rejection letters before finally finding a publisher at a holiday tea party. And, as if that wasn't enough, it opens with the cheesiest opening line ever committed to the page: "It was a dark and stormy night..." Ms. L'Engle had stated that she had trouble finding a publisher for a number of reason, including that the book seemed too difficult for children, but not challenging enough for adults, that her employment of a female protagonist might have been too advanced for most tastes at the time, and that it was difficult to pin down what type of book A Wrinkle in Time was supposed to be. And yet for all this, Wrinkle remains one of the more popular selections on school reading lists. And why not? The story is interesting, the characters are well-written and engaging, and the language it's written in is still accessible to anyone trying to read it (unlike, say, Chaucer perhaps).
Award-winning and frequently challenged, A Wrinkle in Time has never been out of print since it's first publication in 1962 (and that's a feat in itself). Sometimes, you can't keep a good book down. And thank goodness for that.
Challenged and Banned: Huxley's Brave New World
Challenged/Banned Info:
* In 1980, Brave New World was removed from classrooms in Miller, Missouri among other challenges. (1980)
* In 1993, an attempt was made to remove this novel from a California school’s required reading list because it “centered around negative activity”. (1993)
* Challenged at the Yukon, Okla. High School. (1988)
* Removed from Foley (Ala.) High School Library after parent complaint. (2000)
* Frequently challenged for themes of sexuality, drugs, and suicide.
Huxley’s 1931 novel remains a stark and at many times frightening vision of a future where “better living through science” has been taken a step or two too far. In Brave New World Huxley imagines his Utopian World State, a place where people live without the threat of violence, poverty, or hunger. And yet, everyone must consume chemicals to stave off depression, children are born in laboratories and trained to embrace societies caste system, and movies have been replaced with “feelies,” or movies that significantly stimulate the senses, and Henry Ford is revered as God. So, as you can see, all is not well. World State might glitter, but it isn’t gold.
There are several characters to pay attention to, but the three big ones are Bernard Marx, an antisocial man destined to fall in love with himself, Lenina, who is the object of Bernard’s affections and a social misfit in the World State society, and John, who has lived a hard life and knows how to read, a fact that causes others to scorn him for stepping outside of his caste restrictions, and whom will also fall in love with Lenina. Things are going to get really messed up over the course of the novel and, sorry to say, the ending bears a similar tone to George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Which is to say, don’t expect a really happy outcome.
As you can see from the list above, there are some very heavy themes being brought to the fore in this work and, if the rest of the book doesn't incite the censors, then the final chapter (where Huxley essentially blends all the characteristics mentioned in my final bullet point and throws in a healthy dose of violence to boot) certainly does. It's also pretty clear how Mr. Huxley felt about commercialism and the intersection of government and science. It's obvious that World State has taken things to the extreme, like Orwell's 1984; it's easier to make us squirm that way. Still, Huxley's work is brilliant, asking us to examine all that is wrong with his Utopian (or Dystopian) vision and in doing so, to ponder just how far we really are from such a world, to question our own direction and actions.
Brave New World remains one of the most challenged books in print, some 70 years after it's publication.