5
   

Censorship in Modern Times

 
 
djjd62
 
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 08:30 am
Censorship in Modern Times
By M.J. STEPHEY

http://img.timeinc.net/time/2007/banned_books/banned_books_alt_1004.jpg

Since 1982, the American Library Association has sponsored Banned Books Week to pay tribute to free speech and open libraries. The tradition began as a nod to how far society has come since 1557, when Pope Paul IV first established The Index of Prohibited Books to protect Catholics from controversial ideas. Four-hundred and nine years later, Pope Paul VI would abolish it, although attempts at censorship still remain. Here, TIME presents some of the most challenged books of all time.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_candide.jpg

Candide
By Voltaire

This classic French satire lampoons all things sacred " armies, churches, philosophers, even the doctrine of optimism itself. In search of "the best of all possible worlds," Voltaire's ever-hopeful protagonist instead encounters the worst tragedies life has to offer and proceeds to describe each in a rapid, meticulous and matter-of-fact way. The effect is equal parts hilarious and shocking. (Imagine Monty Python circa 1759). The book's phrase "Let us eat the Jesuit. Let us eat him up!" became an instant catchphrase. The Great Council of Geneva and the administrators of Paris banned it shortly after its release, although 30,000 copies sold within a year, making it a best-seller. In 1930, U.S. Customs seized Harvard-bound copies of the book, and, in 1944, the U.S. Post Office demanded that Candide be dropped from the catalog for major retailer Concord Books.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_huckfin.jpg

The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
By Mark Twain

In 1885, the Concord, Mass. Public Library banned the year-old book for its "coarse language" " critics deemed Mark Twain's use of common vernacular (slang) as demeaning and damaging. One reviewer dubbed it "the veriest trash ... more suited to the slums than to intelligent, respectable people." Little Women author Louisa May Alcott lashed out publicly at him, saying, "If Mr. Clemens [Twain's original name] cannot think of something better to tell our pure-minded lads and lasses he had best stop writing for them." (That the word "nigger" appears more than 200 times throughout the book did not initially cause much controversy). In 1905, the Brooklyn Public Library followed Concord's lead, banishing the book from the building's juvenile section, explaining: "Huck not only itched but scratched, and that he said sweat when he should have said perspiration." Twain enthusiastically fired back, once saying of his detractors: "Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it." Luckily for him, the book's fans would eventually outnumber its critics. "It's the best book we've had," Ernest Hemingway proclaimed, "All American writing comes from that. There was nothing before. There has been nothing as good since."

Despite Hemingway's assurances, Huck Finn remains one of the most challenged books in the U.S. In an attempt to avoid controversy, CBS Television produced a made-for-TV adaptation of the book in 1955 that lacked a single mention of slavery, or even any African American cast members to portray the character of Jim. In 1998, parents in Tempe, Ariz. sued the local high school over the book's inclusion on a required reading list. The case went as far as a federal appeals court; the parents lost.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_bravenew.jpg

Brave New World
By Aldous Huxley

Huxley's 1932 work " about a drugged, dull and mass-produced society of the future " has been challenged for its themes of sexuality, drugs, and suicide. The book parodies H.G. Wells utopian novel Men Like Gods, and expresses Huxley's disdain for the youth- and market-driven culture of the United States. Chewing gum, then as now a symbol of America's teeny-bopper shoppers, pops up in the book as a way to deliver sex hormones and subdue anxious adults; pornographic films called "feelies" are also popular grown-up pacifiers.In Huxley's vision of the 26th century, Henry Ford is the new God (worshipers say "Our Ford" instead of "Our Lord,") and the car maker's concept of mass production has been applied to human reproduction. As recently as 1993, a group of parents attempted to ban the book in Corona-Norco, Calif. because it "centered around negativity."

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_1984.jpg

Nineteen Eighty-Four
By George Orwell

It's both ironic and fitting that Nineteen Eighty-Four would join the American Library Association's list of commonly challenged books given its bleak warning of totalitarian censorship. Written in 1949 by the British author while he lay dying of tuberculosis, the book chronicles the grim future of a society robbed of free will, privacy or truth. Some reviewers called it a veiled attack against Joseph Stalin and the Soviet ruler's infamous "midnight purges," though, oddly enough, parents in Jackson County, Fla. would challenge the book in 1981 for being "pro-Communist." The book spawned terms like "Big Brother" and "Orwellian" and continues to appear in pop culture " most recently as the inspiration for a political YouTube hit. The year 1984 may have passed, but the book's message remains as relevant as ever.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_catcherrye.jpg

The Catcher in the Rye
By J.D. Salinger

Within two weeks of its 1951 release, Salinger's novel rocketed to #1 on the New York Times best-seller list. Ever since, the book " which explores three days in the life of a troubled 16-year-old boy " has been "a favorite of censors since its publication," according to the American Library Association. In 1960, school administrators at a high school in Tulsa, Okla. fired an English teacher for assigning the book to an 11th grade class. While the teacher later won his appeal, the book remained off the required reading list. Another community in Columbus, Oh. deemed the book "anti-white," and formed a delegation to have it banned from local schools. One library banned it for violating codes on "excess vulgar language, sexual scenes, things concerning moral issues, excessive violence, and anything dealing with the occult." When asked about the bans, Salinger once said: "Some of my best friends are children. In fact, all my best friends are children. It's almost unbearable for me to realize that my book will be kept on a shelf out of their reach."

The book introduced slang expressions like the term "screw up" (as in, "Boy, it really screws up my sex life something awful.") Literary critics have both hailed and assailed the novel, which broke the literary mold with its focus on character development rather than plot. Holden Caulfield, the novel's protagonist, has since become a symbol of adolescent angst. In 1980, 25-year-old Mark David Chapman shot Beatles legend John Lennon in front of his Manhattan home and later gave the book to police as an explanation for why he did it.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_lolita.jpg

Lolita
By Vladmir Nabokov

First published in France by a pornographic press, this 1955 novel explores the mind of a self-loathing and highly intelligent pedophile named Humbert Humbert, who narrates his life and the obsession that consumes it: his lust for "nymphets" like 12-year-old Dolores Haze. French officials banned it for being "obscene," as did England, Argentina, New Zealand and South Africa. Today, the term "lolita" has come to imply an oversexed teenage siren, although Nabokov, for his part, never intended to create such associations. In fact, he nearly burned the manuscript in disgust, and fought with his publishers over whether an image of a girl should be included on the book's cover.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_cagedbird.jpg

I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings
By Maya Angelou

This 1970 memoir, the first of Angelou's five autobiographical works, angered censors for its graphic depiction of racism and sex, especially the passages in which she recounts being raped by her mother's boyfriend as an eight-year-old child. (In the book, which was later nominated for a National Book Award, Angelou alludes to the Bible, writing: "The act of rape on an eight-year-old body is a matter of the needle giving because the camel can't. The child gives, because the body can, and the mind of the violator can't.") The American Library Association ranked it the 5th most challenged book of the 21st century. The book's title refers to the 1899 poem by Paul Laurence Dunbar, one of the nation's first prominent African American poets. In 1993, Angelou would read an original poem at Bill Clinton's presidential inauguration, becoming only the second poet in U.S. history to do so after Robert Frost's 1960 speech for J.F.K.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_anarchist.jpg

The Anarchist Cookbook
By William Powell

Powell was just 19 when he wrote this 1971 cult classic. The guerrilla how-to book managed to not only anger government officials, but anarchist groups as well. One such organization, CrimethInc., said the book misrepresents anarchist ideals and later released its own book of the same name. Other critics attacked the book for more practical reasons " some of the bomb-making recipes that Powell included turned out to be dangerously inaccurate. Ironically, an older and purportedly wiser Powell later tried to censor his own book. After converting to Christianity, Powell publicly denounced his work, writing in 2000 on Amazon.com that the book is "a misguided product of my adolescent anger at the prospect of being drafted and sent to Vietnam to fight in a war that I did not believe in." But even Powell couldn't successfully ban the book from print; he no longer owns the rights.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_satanicverses.jpg

The Satanic Verses
By Salman Rushdie
Article Tools
Print
Email
Sphere
AddThis
RSS
Yahoo! Buzz

This book sparked riots across the world for what some called a blasphemous treatment of the Islamic faith (throughout the book, Rushdie refers to the Prophet Muhammad as Mahound, the medieval name for the devil). In 1989, five people died in riots in Pakistan and a stone-throwing mob injured 60 people in India. Although Rushdie issued an apology, Iranian spiritual leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini publicly condemned the Indian-British author to death, putting a $1 million bounty on his head (an Iranian assassin would get $3 million, Khomeini promised). While European nations recalled their diplomats from Tehran, some Muslim authors, like Nobel Prize-winner Naguib Mahfouz defended Rushdie and accused the Ayatollah of "intellectual terrorism." Meanwhile, Venezuelan officials threatened anyone who owned or read the book with 15 months of prison. Japan fined anyone who sold the English-language edition; a Japanese translators was subsequently stabbed to death for his involvement with the book. Two major U.S. booksellers " Walden Books and Barnes & Noble " removed the book from shelves after receiving death threats. And while Rushdie's publisher, Viking Penguin, denounced such "censorship by terrorism and intimidation," threats of violence forced the company to temporarily close its New York City office to improve security. Under the protection of British authorities, Rushdie himself lived in hiding for nearly a decade.

http://img.timeinc.net/time/photoessays/2008/banned_books/bannedbooks_harrypotter.jpg

Harry Potter Series
By J.K. Rowling

In 2001, a group of parents in Lewiston, Maine staged an old-fashioned book-burning to torch a series of books they claimed were promoting violence, witchcraft and devil-worship. (The fire department intervened before the first match was struck, and the protest's organizer settled for a pair of scissors with which to mutilate the books.) Though Harry Potter was still in his literary infancy, the boy wizard's saga had already garnered its fair share of opponents; similar public displays of contempt occurred throughout the country. While Rowling has concluded the series, the book still prompts some unsettling displays of public emotion, although most now involve elaborate costumes and patient movie-ticket lines.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 5 • Views: 7,704 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
ebrown p
 
  2  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 09:00 am
Quote:
(The fire department intervened before the first match was struck, and the protest's organizer settled for a pair of scissors with which to mutilate the books.)


This image is so sad in a comical sort of way.

0 Replies
 
Reyn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 11:30 am
@djjd62,
Quote:
[...] the book still prompts some unsettling displays of public emotion [...]

The pen is still mightier than the sword, apparently.

It's always has amazed me that people get so excited about stuff in print. There are so many other things in our world to get worked up about.
0 Replies
 
Merry Andrew
 
  1  
Reply Tue 29 Sep, 2009 11:39 am
@djjd62,
Many thx, dj, for posting this. Back later.
0 Replies
 
djjd62
 
  2  
Reply Sat 3 Oct, 2009 10:46 am
the first post in this thread was from Time

here's some more from Suvudu (Random House)

http://www.suvudu.com/suvudumedia/flowers_algernon.png

Challenged and Banned: Flowers for Algernon

Challenged/Banned Info:

• Banned in Emporium, PA, due to sexually explicit passages that parents feared would awaken their children’s “natural impulses.” 1977
• Challenged in Oberlin, OH, due to sexually explicit passages. 1984
• Banned in Glen Rose, AR, due to language and sexually explicit passages. Objectors compared Flowers for Algernon to “books in plastic covers you see at newsstands.” 1981
• Challenged in Glenrock, WY for sexually explicit passages and language. Objector compared the novel to Playboy and Hustler among other, um, photo-centric publications. 1984
• Challenged in Plant City, FL, (and Arizona, Virginia, and Georgia) for sexually explicit passages, adult themes, and profanity. 1976, 1981, 1996, 1997
• Banned from Aledo (Texas) Middle School, subsequently re-shelved at the school library, but not reinstated into the curriculum. 1999
• Frequently challenged due to objections to “sexually explicit” content.
• Ranks no. 47 on ALA’s 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-2000.

Looking at that list above, how many of you out there are thinking: “Flowers for Algernon? Seriously?”

Surprise, I’m serious!

Flowers for Algernon was originally published in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction and concerns itself with the thoughts of Charlie Gordon. Charlie is mentally-disabled man who works as a janitor and lives a pretty simple life. But it isn’t a “content” life. Charlie wants to be smarter, and in this way he is knowledgeable of his differences from other people. What he doesn’t realize, and what so many readers don’t initially recognize, is that his mental-disability colors the way in which he perceives the world around him.

That is to say, to rip-off twist the popular Spider-Man tag: With greater intelligence comes greater awareness. Charlie, and the reader, will come to find out exactly what that means.

So where's the Sci-Fi? Charlie is offered the chance to undergo a series of treatments that have been designed to increase intelligence. The treatments have been successfully completed on a mouse named Algernon and Charlie represents the human guinea pig of the test trials. As the book is told through Charlie's journal entries, we see his IQ grow as his entries become better composed and express more complex thoughts. Unfortunately, things aren't as easy as suddenly being smarter and well-liked. Charlie starts to re-examine everything he thought he knew before. He is aware now of abuses, veiled insults, and so on, and many of his relationships are strained or broken as a direct result of his growing intelligence.

It's sad stuff, to be sure, and Flowers for Algernon has been pulling at people's heartstrings for quite some time now (40+ years). But not all heartstrings are willing to be pulled. Some want to pull Flowers for Algernon in return...right off the shelf and into the nearest trash can, that is.

Unlike some other challenged and banned books, you'll have to actually go looking for the passages in Flowers that continually set the censors off. They just aren't very big and, in context with the novel, they aren't very lurid or overly erotic. More than any other theme, Flowers for Algernon is frequently hit for being too sexually explicit, meaning censors are zeroing in on Charlie's growing awareness of his attraction to Alice, his fling-relationship with Fay, or an incredibly brief passage about an incident early in Charlie's life when he is sent away.

The longest of these involves Alice, Charlie's big-love. There are a couple of paragraphs that deal with their first time together, Charlie also comes to write that sex without love is an incomplete endeavor. It's a scary thought, right? And what about those couple of paragraphs? Are they dirty, filthy, steam-up-the-windows, make-a-sailor-blush prose? Yeah, not so much. By that point in the novel Charlie is considerably more introspective in nature and, while you're not going to go into the scene unaware of what is happening, it's hardly the stuff that's going to, oh say, "awaken natural impulses" in Charlie's readers. Regardless, these elements beyond any other cause Flowers for Algernon to face challenge after challenge more than any other piece of text or thought in the novel.

It's too bad. Daniel Keyes' book addresses several other points that make the book worthwhile reading; lessons like forgiveness, the universal nature of struggles for love and friendship, and the ideas of self-acceptance and tolerance. Hmmm...dangerous stuff there.

If you haven't already, or if it's been a while, you really should pick up this "offensive" book and give it a read. Like Charlie, you might just see the world afterward with new eyes.

http://www.suvudu.com/suvudumedia/WrinkleInTime.gif

Challenged and Banned: A Wrinkle in Time

Challenged/Banned Info:

• Challenged at the Polk City, Fla. Elementary School under allegations that the story promotes witchcraft, crystal balls, and demons. (1985)
• Challenged in the Anniston Ala. schools under objection to the book’s use of the name of Jesus Christ in relations to other artists, philosophers, scientists, and religious leaders (1990)
• Frequently challenged for “undermining religious beliefs.”
• Ranked no. 22 in the ALA’s 100 most banned books for 1990-2000.

A Wrinkle in Time is the first story of a series about the Murry and O’Keefe families. The book is actually what you might call Science Fantasy; it uses the idea of an additional dimension that acts to bend or fold time and space to allow for rapid travel, called tessering. In a nutshell, Meg Murry, the eldest Murry sibling who is pretty unhappy when the book opens, her youngest brother Charles, and one of Meg’s schoolmates, Calvin O’Keefe, are transported into space by disguised beings who are engaged in a war against a cloud that is the physical manifestation of evil. Of course, Meg, Charles, and Calvin are about to be drawn into the middle of things. Eventually, Meg will have to rescue her younger brother and her father, before everyone is returned home.

Looking at this book’s resume, it’d be hard to identify it as a banned or challenged book. A Wrinkle in Time has been awarded the Newbery Medal, Sequoyah Book Award, and Lewis Carroll Shelf Award, and was runner-up for the Hans Christian Andersen Award. Certainly something that decorated wouldn’t be challenged right? Well, no (obviously, or we wouldn’t be here).

A Wrinkle in Time has enough fantastic elements in it to make people nervous, add to that the inclusion of a religious figure (Jesus) in a story that involves elements not normally associated with said religious figure (time travel and alternate dimensions and such) and you've got a book that's going to keep things interesting in many a PTA meeting. We can say this, because that is exactly what has consistently happened to this title. However, given the lessons that Meg learns at the end of the story, and the way in which she learns she can save her brother (it involves love - GASP!) as well as the context in which some other frequently challenged elements are employed, you have to wonder if the objectors have actually read the book at all.

Actually, it's almost fitting, considering the title's history. Madeleine L'Engle collected some 26 rejection letters before finally finding a publisher at a holiday tea party. And, as if that wasn't enough, it opens with the cheesiest opening line ever committed to the page: "It was a dark and stormy night..." Ms. L'Engle had stated that she had trouble finding a publisher for a number of reason, including that the book seemed too difficult for children, but not challenging enough for adults, that her employment of a female protagonist might have been too advanced for most tastes at the time, and that it was difficult to pin down what type of book A Wrinkle in Time was supposed to be. And yet for all this, Wrinkle remains one of the more popular selections on school reading lists. And why not? The story is interesting, the characters are well-written and engaging, and the language it's written in is still accessible to anyone trying to read it (unlike, say, Chaucer perhaps).

Award-winning and frequently challenged, A Wrinkle in Time has never been out of print since it's first publication in 1962 (and that's a feat in itself). Sometimes, you can't keep a good book down. And thank goodness for that.

http://www.suvudu.com/suvudumedia/newworld.png

Challenged and Banned: Huxley's Brave New World

Challenged/Banned Info:

* In 1980, Brave New World was removed from classrooms in Miller, Missouri among other challenges. (1980)
* In 1993, an attempt was made to remove this novel from a California school’s required reading list because it “centered around negative activity”. (1993)
* Challenged at the Yukon, Okla. High School. (1988)
* Removed from Foley (Ala.) High School Library after parent complaint. (2000)
* Frequently challenged for themes of sexuality, drugs, and suicide.


Huxley’s 1931 novel remains a stark and at many times frightening vision of a future where “better living through science” has been taken a step or two too far. In Brave New World Huxley imagines his Utopian World State, a place where people live without the threat of violence, poverty, or hunger. And yet, everyone must consume chemicals to stave off depression, children are born in laboratories and trained to embrace societies caste system, and movies have been replaced with “feelies,” or movies that significantly stimulate the senses, and Henry Ford is revered as God. So, as you can see, all is not well. World State might glitter, but it isn’t gold.

There are several characters to pay attention to, but the three big ones are Bernard Marx, an antisocial man destined to fall in love with himself, Lenina, who is the object of Bernard’s affections and a social misfit in the World State society, and John, who has lived a hard life and knows how to read, a fact that causes others to scorn him for stepping outside of his caste restrictions, and whom will also fall in love with Lenina. Things are going to get really messed up over the course of the novel and, sorry to say, the ending bears a similar tone to George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Which is to say, don’t expect a really happy outcome.

As you can see from the list above, there are some very heavy themes being brought to the fore in this work and, if the rest of the book doesn't incite the censors, then the final chapter (where Huxley essentially blends all the characteristics mentioned in my final bullet point and throws in a healthy dose of violence to boot) certainly does. It's also pretty clear how Mr. Huxley felt about commercialism and the intersection of government and science. It's obvious that World State has taken things to the extreme, like Orwell's 1984; it's easier to make us squirm that way. Still, Huxley's work is brilliant, asking us to examine all that is wrong with his Utopian (or Dystopian) vision and in doing so, to ponder just how far we really are from such a world, to question our own direction and actions.

Brave New World remains one of the most challenged books in print, some 70 years after it's publication.

0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 12 Feb, 2013 11:31 am
@HUGHJAZZ,
You're replying to a 4-yr-old thread. Be aware that some of the people whom you've addressed are no longer active on the website.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Censorship in Modern Times
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/19/2024 at 03:14:18