"Emoluments clause

Reply Wed 26 Aug, 2009 11:00 pm
Does not the so called "Emoluments clause" of the constitution ( Art. I
sec. 6) prohibit Ms Clinton from assuming the office of Sec. of State?

I recall Richard Nixon appointed Ohio Senator William Saxbe as AG when
Elliot Richardson "resigned" --- Saturday Night Massacre

Pres. Carter appointed Sen. Muskie as Sec. of State when Cyrus Vance quit
--- over the Iran helicopter thing.

It is my recollection that Congress employed the so-called "Saxbe fix"
--- that is to say reducing the compensation of the office to what it was
before the appointee voted on the increase.
But Art. I sec.6 ---allows, in my view, no such escape hatch?

If one were to litigate --- how would standing be established?

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 1,048 • Replies: 2
No top replies

Reply Thu 27 Aug, 2009 12:13 am
The operating theory seems to have been that Ms Clinton accepted the level of compensation in effect prior to her term of office as senator. I don't think the concept was challenged at the Supreme Court, but it would likely stand if it were.
Reply Thu 27 Aug, 2009 12:16 am
Well, I reread your post, and you seem to have accounted for the working principle. Again, I'm inclined to believe it would withstand challenge.
0 Replies

Related Topics

McDonald v. Chicago - Discussion by wandeljw
Best Form of Government - Question by gollum
Separation of Powers question - Question by rdmarcus
Nuclear Option - Question by FKramerJr
Separation of Powers-SCOTUS - Question by samuel46383
Huckabee and the Constitution - Discussion by puzzledperson
Preamble implication in rulings - Question by Dr Preamble
  1. Forums
  2. » "Emoluments clause
Copyright © 2022 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 08/19/2022 at 08:50:53