@McTag,
McTag wrote:
A good article, thanks Hbg.
I, although previously ignorant of the exploits of Mountstewart Elphinstone, counselled against attacking Afghanistan in the days before the ill-fated "Shock and Awe" campaign. For reasons of morality, legality, and common sense as well as historical reasons.
What a tragic episode in our history Bushco has engineered.
Given these prior experiences of British colonial masters in Afghanistan, one can then only wonder at the ease with which they were persuaded to try it all again. Do you believe that was the fault of "Bushco" - or perhaps something else?
From Harare Zimbabwe to Mombassa Kenya and Karachi Pakistan the political residue & successors to British colonialism do not generally reflect favorably on their former masters.
We shall see what emerges with respect to the origins of the recent attacks in Mumbai. If, as seems at least possible, some origins (or prior training) in the border regions of Afghanistan and Pakistan was involved, I expect the interest of the world in dealing with this cauldron - or at least limiting the export of opium, violence and murder from it - will increase.
In any event the current campaign in Afghanistan is hardly a detectable addition to the long, ghastly history of British Imperialism -- though it is understandably comforting to contemporary Brits to now have someone else to blame for their actions.