3
   

mini nuke plants

 
 
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 06:27 am
I've always figured that the most major problem with nuclear reactors has been the super-human scale on which they've been built....

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/09/miniature-nuclear-reactors-los-alamos

Quote:



* Environment
* Nuclear power

Mini nuclear plants to power 20,000 homes
£13m shed-size reactors will be delivered by lorry

* John Vidal and Nick Rosen
* guardian.co.uk, Sunday November 9 2008 00.01 GMT
* The Observer, Sunday November 9 2008
* Article history

Nuclear power plants smaller than a garden shed and able to power 20,000 homes will be on sale within five years, say scientists at Los Alamos, the US government laboratory which developed the first atomic bomb.

The miniature reactors will be factory-sealed, contain no weapons-grade material, have no moving parts and will be nearly impossible to steal because they will be encased in concrete and buried underground.

The US government has licensed the technology to Hyperion, a New Mexico-based company which said last week that it has taken its first firm orders and plans to start mass production within five years. 'Our goal is to generate electricity for 10 cents a watt anywhere in the world,' said John Deal, chief executive of Hyperion. 'They will cost approximately $25m [£13m] each. For a community with 10,000 households, that is a very affordable $250 per home.'

Deal claims to have more than 100 firm orders, largely from the oil and electricity industries, but says the company is also targeting developing countries and isolated communities. 'It's leapfrog technology,' he said.

The company plans to set up three factories to produce 4,000 plants between 2013 and 2023. 'We already have a pipeline for 100 reactors, and we are taking our time to tool up to mass-produce this reactor.'

The first confirmed order came from TES, a Czech infrastructure company specialising in water plants and power plants. 'They ordered six units and optioned a further 12. We are very sure of their capability to purchase,' said Deal. The first one, he said, would be installed in Romania. 'We now have a six-year waiting list. We are in talks with developers in the Cayman Islands, Panama and the Bahamas.'

The reactors, only a few metres in diameter, will be delivered on the back of a lorry to be buried underground. They must be refuelled every 7 to 10 years. Because the reactor is based on a 50-year-old design that has proved safe for students to use, few countries are expected to object to plants on their territory. An application to build the plants will be submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission next year.

'You could never have a Chernobyl-type event - there are no moving parts,' said Deal. 'You would need nation-state resources in order to enrich our uranium. Temperature-wise it's too hot to handle. It would be like stealing a barbecue with your bare hands.'

Other companies are known to be designing micro-reactors. Toshiba has been testing 200KW reactors measuring roughly six metres by two metres. Designed to fuel smaller numbers of homes for longer, they could power a single building for up to 40 years.

  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 3 • Views: 1,032 • Replies: 5
No top replies

 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 06:41 am
perhaps, if there were enough in an area, a team of operators could share the "circuit riding" chores to see that these reactors were always safe. Im a bit concerned about the safety issue. If these mini reactors were deployed to cover a suburban metro area, that would mean 100 reactors for every 2 million population. Thats a lot of reactors out there and the siting issues dont go away just because the units are smaller. Think about this, we have the same environmental concerns for buried fuel tanks of 250 gallons or less as we do for buried tanks (USTs) at 100000 gallons or more.

Refueling each of the mini reactors would mean having trucks carrying fuel rods out on the highways at an almost99.9999% statistical assurance for any time period.

I await the FERC reports on this option.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 07:26 am
Nothing really new since March 2003 - only that some new capital came from the Altira Group and -most recently- "adventure capital" by the Santa Fe venture group "Purple Mountain Venture".

So they are now just looking for some place for building a factory ...
0 Replies
 
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 07:57 am
In the US, the 40 CFR regs stipulate to what constitutes an"environmentally safe location for nuclear power facilities". The issue is one of protecting ground waters that serve as potential water supplies and serve as the 70% or so of base level stream flows (Which is essentially every stream).

The states also have "selection and rejection criteria" with which locations of nook plants must comply.
Like I said, lets see what FERC says and the state nuclear siting commissions
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 07:59 am
There's more to a nuclear power plant than just a bunch of "hot" rods packed in concrete. You have to convert that heat into electricity and the normal way to do that is to boil water and turn turbines. All of which means that these plants are not going to be as "mini" as they might appear at first glance.

I would like to see the plans (drawings) for a plant like this.

Deckland
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Nov, 2008 01:39 pm
@rosborne979,
I wonder if it's like a thermocouple type device (no moving parts). What do they use on space craft ? I think the Russians used some sort of nuclear/thermocouple power supply on theirs.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » mini nuke plants
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/02/2024 at 10:56:55