@spendius,
Quote: As I understand it Darwin and Fitzroy were not always on the friendliest of terms and the crew had much fun taking the piss out of Darwin for his Christian thinking which he derived from Milton whose books he had with him on the voyage.
From writings of Darwin, Fitzroy, and Darwins own "manservant", Fitzroy and Darwin NEVER argued re: doctrinal issues during the voyage. They had a few dustups on slavery . The real "falling out" began several years after the voyage when Fitzroy published his own journal of the voyage followed by Darwins. Fitzroy gradually distanced himself from the scientific worldviews that Darwin posed in his "Voyage...".(Even though it was Fitzroy who presented DArwin with Lyells book as a sort of bon voyage gift) THen when Darwin published the "Origin..." 20 years after, Fitzroy, by publically arguing fpr a traditional Bible centered science, was often booed off stages whenever he was invited to speak.
Fitzroy was a man prone to incapacitating depressions that manifested themselves when he was a "post Beagle" citizen. (HE was after all, the father of the Weather Channel and was a governor of New Zealand for a few years in the 1840's, so his life wasnt devoid of human contact). However, his suicide did correspond to his life well after "The Origin..." when he possibly despaired re: DArwin's "Acute aetheistic errors in interpretation and his denial of a God"...
So he sliced himself in the throat and let Darwin win by default , the putz.