1
   

Free market triumphalism is everywhere

 
 
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:32 am
Free market" triumphalism is everywhere under Libertarian Lies, Depraved Aristocracy, Right Wing Degenerates, Torture, Capitalism, Neoliberalism, Neocolonialism, "Free" Trade, Exploitation, Corporatism, Savage Capitalism, Reaganites, Bourgeoisie, Empathy Deficient

[Reaganomics adherents are today's neoconservatives with the "full force of the US military machine (serving their unfettered) corporate agenda" of greed writ large. Its holy policy trinity is: "elimination of the public sphere, total liberation for corporations and skeletal social spending (if any at all)." But instead of lifting all boats as promised, it's the mirror opposite. It creates a powerful ruling corporatist class partnered with corrupted political elites - "with hazy and ever-shifting lines between the two groups."]

Review of Naomi Klein's "The Shock Doctrine"
by Stephen Lendman
9/20/07

Naomi Klein is an award-winning Canadian journalist, author, documentary filmmaker and activist. She writes a regular column for The Nation magazine and London Guardian that's syndicated internationally by the New York Times Syndicate that gives people worldwide access to her work but not its own readers at home.

In 2004, she and her husband and co-producer Avi Lewis released their first feature documentary - "The Take." It covered the explosion of activism in the wake of Argentina's 2001 economic crisis. People responded with neighborhood assemblies, barter clubs, mass movements of the unemployed and workers taking over bankrupt companies and reopening them under their own management.

Klein is also the author of three books. Her first was "No Logo - Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies" (2000) that analyzes the destructive forces of globalization. Next came "Fences and Windows - Dispatches from the Front Lines of the Globalization Debate" (2002) covering the global revolt against corporate power.

Her newest book just out is "The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism" that explodes the myth of "free market" democracy. It shows how neoliberal Washington Consensus fundamentalism dominates the world with America its lead exponent exploiting security threats, terror attacks, economic meltdowns, competing ideologies, tectonic political or economic shifts, and natural disasters to impose its will everywhere. Wars are waged, social services cut, and freedom sacrificed when people are too distracted, cowed or bludgeoned to object. Klein describes a worldwide process of social and economic engineering she calls "disaster capitalism" with torture along for the ride to reinforce the message - no "New World Order" alternatives are tolerated.

"Free market" triumphalism is everywhere - from Canada to Brazil, China to Bulgaria, Russia to South Africa, Vietnam to Iraq. In all cases, the results are the same. People are sacrificed for profits and Margaret Thatcher's dictum applies - "there is no alternative."

"The Shock Doctrine" is a powerful tour de force, four years of on-the-ground research in the making and well worth the wait. In an age of corporatism partnered with corrupted political elites, it's a must reading by an author now firmly established as a major intellectual figure on the left and champion of social justice. Naomi Klein is all that and more. Even for those familiar with her topics, the book is stunning, revealing, unforgettable and essential to know. This review will cover a healthy sample of what's in store for readers in the full exquisitely written text. It's in seven parts with a concluding section. Each will be discussed below starting with a brief introduction.

http://www.bestcyrano.org/THOMASPAINE/?p=308
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 2,206 • Replies: 12
No top replies

 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:38 am
well, certainly a lot of politico-babble. Hard to sort though it and understand the intended message.
0 Replies
 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 10:58 am
Dys
dyslexia wrote:
well, certainly a lot of politico-babble. Hard to sort though it and understand the intended message.


Agree. That's the problem with so many socalists. Their ideological babble obscures any truths in their beliefs. Makes it hard to work with them for a good cause.

BBB
0 Replies
 
helmi15
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 12:37 pm
There are many books about this issue in the stores nowadays.

Most people who decry drawbacks in our world, in fact just want to make money I guess.

A good example is Michael Moore. He keeps talking about how bad everything is instead of helping or making any good suggestions to make the situation better.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 02:00 pm
Given the nearly universal failure of every application of socialist economic principles in the past century, it is easily understandable why its proponents would choose to disguise their badly tarnished pack of wares with confusing babble and meaningless jargon. Nothing that so flies in the face of common sense and human experience can be long taken seriously if it is described with clarity and precision.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 02:02 pm
I may be sorry I asked pretty soon -- but what are Naomi Klein's plans for a better economic system again?
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 02:25 pm
Thomas wrote:
I may be sorry I asked pretty soon -- but what are Naomi Klein's plans for a better economic system again?


This may be the key to your answer -( from a few pages down the cited link)
Quote:
,,,The epicenter of shock ideology is the University of Chicago Economics Department. It came out of the 1950s "in the thrall" (of a) man on a mission to fundamentally revolutionize his profession," and on that score Milton Friedman succeeded mightily. Friedman, now gone, believed markets work efficiently and best unfettered of rules, regulations, onerous taxes, trade barriers, entrenched interests, and human interference. ...

Friedman taught this voodoo science and believed to the end, all contrary evidence aside, it was perfect and worked. Chicago School fundamentalism developed at a post-war time in the 1950s when leftist ideas supporting worker rights were gaining ground. Where they "promised (workers) freedom from bosses, citizens from dictatorship (and) countries from colonialism," Friedman promised "individual freedom" to choose that appealed to owners of capital who embraced him and his thinking.

It stood in stark contrast to what became known as "developmentalism" or "Third World nationalism" in the post-war developing world. Economists in it favored an "inward-oriented industrialization" strategy to break the cycle of poverty and grow. Like Keynesians and social democrats, they showed it worked in Latin America's Southern Cone with leaders like Juan Peron "put(ting) their ideas into practice with a vengeance (by) pouring public money into infrastructure projects, (providing) local businesses generous subsidies, and keeping out foreign imports withÂ….high tariffs." It brought prosperity to the South and "dark days" for Friedman, his acolytes, and free-wheeling capitalists losing out to social progress.


It is the economic theory promoted by that celebrated champion of economic innovation, social justice, and lasting prosperity, - Juan Domingo Peron, of Argentina, -- that is the promise of the Socialist nirvana our author so energetically seeks.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 05:08 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Thomas wrote:
I may be sorry I asked pretty soon -- but what are Naomi Klein's plans for a better economic system again?


This may be the key to your answer -( from a few pages down the cited link)
Quote:
,,,The epicenter of shock ideology is the University of Chicago Economics Department. It came out of the 1950s "in the thrall" (of a) man on a mission to fundamentally revolutionize his profession," and on that score Milton Friedman succeeded mightily. Friedman, now gone, believed markets work efficiently and best unfettered of rules, regulations, onerous taxes, trade barriers, entrenched interests, and human interference. ...

Friedman taught this voodoo science and believed to the end, all contrary evidence aside, it was perfect and worked. Chicago School fundamentalism developed at a post-war time in the 1950s when leftist ideas supporting worker rights were gaining ground. Where they "promised (workers) freedom from bosses, citizens from dictatorship (and) countries from colonialism," Friedman promised "individual freedom" to choose that appealed to owners of capital who embraced him and his thinking.

It stood in stark contrast to what became known as "developmentalism" or "Third World nationalism" in the post-war developing world. Economists in it favored an "inward-oriented industrialization" strategy to break the cycle of poverty and grow. Like Keynesians and social democrats, they showed it worked in Latin America's Southern Cone with leaders like Juan Peron "put(ting) their ideas into practice with a vengeance (by) pouring public money into infrastructure projects, (providing) local businesses generous subsidies, and keeping out foreign imports withÂ….high tariffs." It brought prosperity to the South and "dark days" for Friedman, his acolytes, and free-wheeling capitalists losing out to social progress.


It is the economic theory promoted by that celebrated champion of economic innovation, social justice, and lasting prosperity, - Juan Domingo Peron, of Argentina, -- that is the promise of the Socialist nirvana our author so energetically seeks.
What a relief, I was thinking it might be something radical.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 05:12 pm
dyslexia wrote:
What a relief, I was thinking it might be something radical.


No, it turns out it was just something utterly stupid and thoroughly discredited.
0 Replies
 
tinygiraffe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 07:29 pm
a free market is great, but what we're talking about isn't a free market.

we're really talking about "trusting" corporations not to screw people over. if all the bigger companies buy out all the smaller ones, control the media, deny us civil rights, and pay off the government to the point of owning or becoming it, it's the consumer's job to somehow organize the way he spends his money to prevent this-

and not the government's job to step in and demand for instance, that you give your illegal immigrant worker enough wage to pay for the potatoes and clean water you also own.

that's what "libertarianism" seems to mean in the united states, but let's be fair, it's got nothing to do with libertarianism elsewhere.

still, by the standards of most people crying "free market, small government," what they really mean is- "no civil rights unless you pay for them." by american standards, george w. bush isn't a republican at all, he's the ultimate "libertarian" leader. i would love a real third party, i gave up on republicans first and liberals (the candidates, not the voters) second,
but i'll be reincarnated as jesus christ before i vote for one of these "libertarian" nuts.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 08:35 pm
Greed and venality are common features of human nature - equally present in both capitalist and socialist systems. It is a delusion to suppose that socialism will cure the defects of human nature. The Soviets tried it and killed tens of millions in the process - it didn't work.

Large corporations in capitalist systems are indeed capable of abuses - until they in turn are knocked off by upstart competitors. The even larger, monopolistic, government owned or controlled corporations of socialist systems last forever (or until the system itself is brought down). They are capable of even worse and more long-lasting abuses.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 21 Sep, 2007 08:44 pm
tinyg, Consumers are not that bright; they buy rocks as pets.
0 Replies
 
tinygiraffe
 
  1  
Reply Sat 22 Sep, 2007 01:22 am
all the more reason that consumerism shouldn't be the sole foundation for civil liberty...

"ooh look, rights for the elderly in homes!"
"how much?"

"oh... nevermind, i'll put it back... OH LOOK A PET ROCK! AND IT'S VERY NICELY PRICED!"

Sad
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Free market triumphalism is everywhere
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.08 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:27:21