Fri 8 Jun, 2007 02:31 am - [quote="jonathanasdf"]LOL ! you went to WIKI???!
1 or 2 pages back I posted proving why it couldn't be 28 cm. Then, since Dr. Math said it was 26, it is 26![/quote]
Yes, you... (view)
Wed 6 Jun, 2007 10:14 pm - i just used congruency rules and alternating angles or whatever, because the lines are paralell, to find out that they are 45.
edit: yes, tooter if you could clarify yours a bit i am also... (view)
Wed 6 Jun, 2007 10:06 pm - [quote="tooter"][quote="smokeybear"]i used the law of sines, with the 24 from one of the given blue lines.[/quote]
Your formula for the Radius is incorrect.
It should be... (view)
Wed 6 Jun, 2007 10:04 pm - [quote="jonathanasdf"]Sorry tooter. I didn't look at the image and forgot how it was.
klo you are right. For sine law to work there can't be 2 unknowns in the equation, so he... (view)
Wed 6 Jun, 2007 10:03 pm - I'm not quite sure what you're asking, c was not used in the formula.. i hope this clears that step up! but maybe i am wrong altogether, it's been a while since i've done... (view)
Wed 6 Jun, 2007 09:30 pm - [img]http://i208.photobucket.com/albums/bb311/nooneloved/lennyconundrum.jpg[/img]
yo devineatheist we got the same answer. someone can check this if they want. anyways, that's what i got! ciao. (view)