Thu 15 Jan, 2009 10:48 pm - Ok, where in the constitution does it say that homosexuality is wrong? The constitution was written to reflect that all men are created equal. There is NO evidence in all of history to say that 1.... (view)
Thu 15 Jan, 2009 10:19 pm - ... you realize that by "arguing" my point you made it for me? You state that "the courts make sure that the laws are constitutional and that individuals are treated fairly under the... (view)
Thu 15 Jan, 2009 09:41 pm - I disagree. The courts were the ones who forced the first unsegregated school. It was the courts who ruled that laws were unconstitutional that led to the creation of legislation for equal rights.... (view)
Thu 15 Jan, 2009 09:13 pm - kind of like the civil rights movement and women's suffrage? why is this really so different for you from any other civil rights movement? (view)
Wed 14 Jan, 2009 09:45 am - But that argument is based on the assumption that something is WRONG or abnormal about homosexuality. You all talk about it like all homosexuals should go to jail, like some terrible injustice is... (view)
Tue 13 Jan, 2009 11:18 pm - First, your argument for "rights that they never had" is completely wrong. Everyone in this country who is a natural citizen is assumed to have the same rights as every other citizen of... (view)
Tue 13 Jan, 2009 09:36 pm - "The burden on you is to convince others that it is wrong in the case of gays" (hawkeye10)
-Isn't that what political activism is for? Haven't you been telling us how wrong it... (view)
Mon 12 Jan, 2009 08:22 pm - But who gets to determine that it is immoral behavior? I believe that lying is immoral behavior and that all liars should be punished. Therefore, anyone who lies is no longer allowed to vote.
I... (view)
Mon 12 Jan, 2009 07:39 pm - So, I haven't actually posted on this in a long time, and I want to respond to several things that have been brought up. I apologize in advance for the length of this post.
First, going... (view)
Fri 9 Jan, 2009 07:27 pm - Yes, you can use that argument to excuse any behavior that is not supported medically. The original argument that we've been debating in the last few pages of the thread is whether or not the... (view)
