rockhead wrote :
Quote:That was not the sad part.
She saw one of her associates in line, and they started to commiserate over her dilemma. This was her fourth bust. She will be classified as a habitual offender. They were discussing warrants and cause as though they were paralegals, and angry that they were not just allowed to do what they wanted.
(No pimps were harmed)
Thoughts?
i googled/cheated : " Why should we walk a mile in someone else's shoes before we criticize them ? "
one of the answers was :
Quote: It means that before you judge them or something they do or say, you should look at the situation from their viewpoint. Try to see it how they see it. Try to understand all views on the conflict, not just your own.
It is basically saying that you should keep an open mind and not criticize before you understand and think about any alternate interpretations to the situation.
I agree with it - too often, people are too ignorant or stuborn to realize that there might actually be another perfectly rational and legitimate way to see things.
i suppose i should have first stated my own answer to the question/dilemma told by rockhead - this was an easy way out .
i would add that it is often impossible for an outsider to understand what a person that is "down and out" has gone through . how can we understand how and why they arrived at such a low point (the way we see it , but does the person "down and out" even agree that they are at a low point ? i surely don't know! ) .
i certainly would not pass judgement on the person . what brought them down ? job loss , mental problem , little education ... and the list goes on and on !
my personal belief is that in our "modern and enlightened (???) " society every person should be entitled to be able to live in dignity - even if they are not holding down a job for whatever reason .
i gave that answer on some other thread and was quickly shot down because it would be "charity by government " - "can't have that" , i was told .
(it seems to be that all governments hand out charity of one kind or another - even to large corporations - but that seems to fall under a different heading) .
enough rambling for tonight !
hbg