Fri 1 Oct, 2010 11:07 pm - and what exactly was your argument for allowing God to restrict a person's freedom in order to prevent harm, because apparently i'm blind and cannot see it. (view)
Fri 1 Oct, 2010 10:51 pm - so far you haven't presented any argument for why God should prevent someone from doing harm, you have argued against this by saying that it is wrong to rely on Him. (view)
Fri 1 Oct, 2010 10:35 pm - first of all, i never said i accepted his answer i just appreciate the fact that he gave an answer instead of trying to debate my question. second, this is not my ideology (i'm agnostic i... (view)
Fri 1 Oct, 2010 08:07 pm - Virtues are only good because they allow us to cope with suffering, why would God want us to suffer just for the sake of obtaining virtues? Most would agree that it's better to not have... (view)
Fri 1 Oct, 2010 07:45 pm - But since God is not human he's not supposed to get bored. If a man decides to set a house on fire and a baby is burned to death, by Western understanding of God (omnipotent, omniscient, all... (view)
Fri 1 Oct, 2010 07:36 pm - But what you're saying is that parents spoiling their children is similar to God letting his children (humanity) suffer when technically he can prevent it (being omnipotent) and wanting to... (view)
Fri 1 Oct, 2010 07:23 pm - An argument cannot be a question, each premise has to state a specific point that relates to the previous premise and results in a conclusion. The conclusion being the idea that I originally posted. (view)
