Baby Soft Porn?

Re: Baby Soft Porn?


This is interesting. Why have you "gotta" think "the same way some sick M-F-er does"? That Chai Tea guy clearly finds thinking like that an easy thing to do. Anyone who has been a parent or a relative of a baby will tell you that babies can be sweet looking. This is nature's way of making sure they get bonded so they don't get abandoned or ignored. Even non-relatives find babies cute, such is the power of this.

They can have cute faces, hands, feet, toes, eyes, noses, hair, whatever. Yes, even bottoms and other things. It is natural to find these things cute.

If you think that depicting naked babies is sexually provocative, if it makes your "blood boil", even if you claim that it's "other people" who will be provoked, then maybe it's YOU that has a problem. Even if it is only the problem of prudishness and nothing more.

PS learn how to spell "paedophile" (British Commonwealth) or "pedophile" (US).

You're correct convex...I'm a 42 year old white male pederast. Your instincts about me were dead on.

I have always been a loner, and a drifter. When I get to a new city, I obtain employment selling ice cream or balloons in parks, and seek out women online who are single moms looking for a strong father figure for their children.



Yes, I'm quite sure no one who is sexually aroused by children has never watched one of those commercials and been excited.

That's because everyone thinks exactly the same way you do, and thinks showing naked children is innocent and cute and the only emotion it evokes in any human being is maternal/paternal love and longing, along with a strong instinctual urge to protect the child from all harm.

Thank you for setting me straight.

Pedophiles find what excites them everywhere. Clothing catalogs, illustrated holiday brochures, newspapers, tweeny movies and magazines, women's magazines, vast numbers of baby magazines, whatever. Covering up babies is like putting panties on cats and dogs like they did in the 19th century.

In Anglo-saxon countries like Britain and the USA, there is vastly more prudishness around nudity than in latin countries. You'd be shocked by TV ads in Italy or Spain. Yet those countries have much fewer attacks on children.

contrex

how exactly do you think pedaphiles are sought out by the police?

you seemed determined to prove me wrong, and now that I have shot down your theory that I'm a member of NAMBLA, you are now contending anyone who would say such a thing is a prude.

Have you never heard of putting yourself in the mind of a serial killer? Fortunatley that does not make your one.

If you choose to hold onto your fond desires that nothing untoward can be seen in anything that's thrown onto the airwaves, I don't believe you've been exposed to the darker side of human nature too often.

Or else, Big Brother has succeeded.

This entire thread is funny, if you knew where my earlier statement came from.

I'm not going to argue with you.

BTW, how exactly do you know where I'm from....? For all you know, I could have just moved here from Milano 6 months ago. That's why I can't spell pedaphile.

Arrividercci

Re: Baby Soft Porn?
[quote="contrex
This is interesting. Why have you "gotta" think "the same way some sick M-F-er does"? [/quote]

-----

Because it is our job to protect the children.

-----

quote="contrex
That Chai Tea guy clearly finds thinking like that an easy thing to do.[/quote]

-----

That Chai Tea guy is a very nice lady who also wants to see the children protected.

-----

quote="contrex
Anyone who has been a parent or a relative of a baby will tell you that babies can be sweet looking. This is nature's way of making sure they get bonded so they don't get abandoned or ignored. Even non-relatives find babies cute, such is the power of this.

They can have cute faces, hands, feet, toes, eyes, noses, hair, whatever. Yes, even bottoms and other things. It is natural to find these things cute.
[/quote]

-----

This is simply stating the obvious. I did not say babies are not cute. I did not say babies' bottoms are not cute. Chai Tea did not say babies' bottoms are not cute.

-----

quote="contrex
If you think that depicting naked babies is sexually provocative, if it makes your "blood boil", even if you claim that it's "other people" who will be provoked, then maybe it's YOU that has a problem. Even if it is only the problem of prudishness and nothing more.
[/quote]

-----

Personally I do not find anything sexually provocative about naked babies. I find virile adult men of pleasant aspect, nature and suitable age sexually provocative, but, when it comes to babies I feel protective towards them. (It's part of that 'bonding' bit you mentioned.)

I have had my share of naked babies toddling around the house, being loved by the people around them, being nurtured and cared for, and never once have I had to worry about the attitudes or motives of those people.

But there is no way on God's earth I would have accepted money to let someone film those babies' posteriors for public display, especially knowing that some day someone was likely to tape that film and get their rocks off watching it.

And I promise you, there is little that is prudish in my make-up.

-----

quote="contrex
PS learn how to spell "paedophile" (British Commonwealth) or "pedophile" (US).[/quote]

-----

I do know how to spell paedophile. Actually I didn't use the word. I used Chai's quote from another thread.

Hear that everyone?


I'm a nice lady.

You're also a loner, a drifter, an ice cream or balloon seller, and on the hunt for single women with kids (see below). Whatever happened to "a butcher, a baker, a candlestick maker", or "tinker, tailer, soldier, sailor"?

Chai! You're NOT who I thought you were

You people disgust me. Such dirty minds.

Now FETUS PORN is where it's at. I've got boxes of ultrasound videotape under my bed, a bottle of lotion in the bathroom. Tonight's going to be a busy one!

Fetus porn. Beer.

Does life get any better than that?

I like to watch sonograms of goat fetuses.

If you're talkin' girl on girl fetus (twins), and a sixer of Busch Light, I say that's as good as it gets hombre!

Ok, that's just sick. I mean that's beastiality.

I have a girlfriend who pregant with twins, a boy and a girl...

there're in a 69 position with the girl on top.

Now, if there were only a goat in there....