Reply
Tue 11 Jul, 2006 09:35 am
Bombay, as known dually, the money capital of India was on terrorist attacks today. Blasts occurred at several highly crowded suburban stations. Around 63 got killed and more than 400 injured. The calamity will increase.
Mumbai Blasts 2006
AAAARRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH
Just heard it on Radio. Thanks for the link.Mumbai is no more a safe place to live in. I have checked it off from my list of "I have to live here after I finish education" cities.
I have come to believe that it is the common man who suffers most in these cases. Mumbai local trains are the cheapest means of travel in the city and attract thousands of middleclass Mumbaites (besides all the non-mumbai people basically tourists) who just can't afford the mounting petrol rates.
Hell,if these terrorists are really brave enough why don't they blast off the offics of those blockhead politicians. Why kill innocents who don't have anything to do with them?
Very sorry for the victims, hope this isn't repeated.
1993, 2002, 2003 and now 2006 & U prayin for it wont repeat?
With these foolish gang of politicians what else can we do.......
A recent survey by Readers' Digest revealed that Mumbai is the worst city in the world to live in. Worst? I don't quite agree to it especially when they justify if by reasons like people are rude, don't open doors to strangers...etc.
But, yes, terrorism does make Mumbai quite unsafe.
very very sad.
a friend was on one of those trains, travelling to Borivali. But I heard from common friends that she's OK.
As for mumbai being the rudest city. That's bunkum. We have a different kind of "manners" altogether. I found Mumbaiites very helpful, in fact.
As I flipped through the pages of the morning newspaper, the images of people wailing, the demolished bogies and blood-ridden bodies really terrified me. Really really sad indeed. Interestingly, all the targetted coaches were the first class ones. Moreover,these serial blasts have coincided with the grenade attacks on Srinagar tourists(mostly rich Bengalis). Mumbai incident has, unfortunately, overshadowed the latter.
No, I was wrong - its not the common man alone who suffers. Everybody is coming under their radar screen - high class travelers, worshippers, celebrities. They don't want to spare anyone.
=================================================
Mr. Shivraj Patil, Minister of Home Affairs, was reported saying," We'll crush terrorism under our feet."
Ridiculous!
Will someone ask him out as to why did his people crush POTA?
================================================
The million dollar question is how did those people manage to place the bombs on the coaches. Besides, other things to look into will be - What triggered the detonation? Did the passengers notice unidentified objects and suspected?
It can help avoid such incidents in the future.
Mumbaites Rude
See Post ...
http://www.able2know.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2139594#2139594
Mumbaites are rude? Reader's Digest is a BIG TIME lier.
Has anyone claimed responsibility yet? Last I heard, late yesterday afternoon, they were not sure who did it or why?
Any answers to that?
Hey Vinsan, our sympathies from here in the UK. Our daily TV news is still full of reports from Mumbai, and they say that the city got into action pretty quickly to restore the railway timetable.
189 dead, awful.
Do we know yet who is suspected of the crime?
McTag
SIMI thats an intra-country terrorist organization.
Another claim is that a Mafia Gang Leader Dawood Ibrahim had several illegal constructions around the city which were decided to be demolished some days sooner. Enraged Dawood may have done the blasts hence. He has already been held repsonsible for 1993 Mumbai Blasts.
He is confirmed to be staying in Pakistan.
Input from the blogs... posted by my friend, a writer from Mumbai on Zzeblog:
Bombay Blasts: Terrorism, Communication & Fashion
While the sender and receiver remain unknown, the message of terror uses people as its medium, and broadcast media as the consumers of fear. When fear is sent and fear is seen by the sender, the message is considered "sent". In fact, in its purest inhuman form, terrorism is communication.
The sender of a message needs feedback, like a receipt, to complete the test. The Varanasi blasts was Hindutva (BJP) testing its own atrophying muscle, and on Sunday Shiv Sena made a mockery of itself with the theatre of "statue desecration". Almost every man I have talked with - on the streets, in restaurants and hotels, rickshaw and taxi drivers - believes that terror is almost always an inside job. And yet, the media does not hesitate in pasting the blame on Pakistan, LeT, jihadis, and some such amorphous abstraction. And that abstraction is always a euphemism for Islam.
Only first class compartments were bombed, because they accommodate middle-class executives - laptops and fancy cell-phones. They hardly ever look at each other, and remain lost in their screens. If a three-headed giraffe floated past the doorway, they wouldn't notice. I have seen many a zero-legged people, four-eyed women, and three-headed giraffes float past the windy doorways of second class. Why don't they make the entire train second class, since the view is so much better?
One of the images on TV was of a young hunk, like the bassist of any local heavy metal band, holding a phone and
then he turns to look at the camera, blood streaming down the sides of his face, just like in the movies. No, he will not let any pain show on his face, it won't look good on the camera. That's the new Mumbaikar for you - fashion without fear. Don't let it show, don't let the message get past you. That is why my moustache and turban is so important to me - you may bomb my city, you may kill my people, but as long as I live, you will not be able to take down my turban. Get the message?
The act of terror is like a stone dropped into a flowing river.
At once the subject of communication in the city becomes One, and at once the normal channels break down and new channels arise. Strangers look at each other and sigh, shake their heads, they smile. Two men walking down the road look at each other and one says, "Bal Thackeray is finished
." - the other nods in satisfaction. They are both thinking about the mayhem Shiv Sena caused on Sunday, which everyone knows. The connection is there, even if it is not there. Life finds a way to express itself in the arms of death. In this manner, communication is de-personalised and re-socialised. This is not a good thing for the terrorist, since his objective was entirely different. Very soon, having dissipated their fears through jokes, life trots back to "normal".
Life is never normal. The only surprising thing about life is that it exists, and the rest is understandable.
Posted by Fadereu on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 at 11:04 PM
Kind of weird view towards the incident. Foolish perhaps.
Sorry Dag.
dagmaraka wrote:Input from the blogs... posted by my friend, a writer from Mumbai on Zzeblog:
Bombay Blasts: Terrorism, Communication & Fashion
While the sender and receiver remain unknown, the message of terror uses people as its medium, and broadcast media as the consumers of fear. When fear is sent and fear is seen by the sender, the message is considered "sent". In fact, in its purest inhuman form, terrorism is communication.
The sender of a message needs feedback, like a receipt, to complete the test. The Varanasi blasts was Hindutva (BJP) testing its own atrophying muscle, and on Sunday Shiv Sena made a mockery of itself with the theatre of "statue desecration". Almost every man I have talked with - on the streets, in restaurants and hotels, rickshaw and taxi drivers - believes that terror is almost always an inside job. And yet, the media does not hesitate in pasting the blame on Pakistan, LeT, jihadis, and some such amorphous abstraction. And that abstraction is always a euphemism for Islam.
Only first class compartments were bombed, because they accommodate middle-class executives - laptops and fancy cell-phones. They hardly ever look at each other, and remain lost in their screens. If a three-headed giraffe floated past the doorway, they wouldn't notice. I have seen many a zero-legged people, four-eyed women, and three-headed giraffes float past the windy doorways of second class. Why don't they make the entire train second class, since the view is so much better?
One of the images on TV was of a young hunk, like the bassist of any local heavy metal band, holding a phone and
then he turns to look at the camera, blood streaming down the sides of his face, just like in the movies. No, he will not let any pain show on his face, it won't look good on the camera. That's the new Mumbaikar for you - fashion without fear. Don't let it show, don't let the message get past you. That is why my moustache and turban is so important to me - you may bomb my city, you may kill my people, but as long as I live, you will not be able to take down my turban. Get the message?
The act of terror is like a stone dropped into a flowing river.
At once the subject of communication in the city becomes One, and at once the normal channels break down and new channels arise. Strangers look at each other and sigh, shake their heads, they smile. Two men walking down the road look at each other and one says, "Bal Thackeray is finished
." - the other nods in satisfaction. They are both thinking about the mayhem Shiv Sena caused on Sunday, which everyone knows. The connection is there, even if it is not there. Life finds a way to express itself in the arms of death. In this manner, communication is de-personalised and re-socialised. This is not a good thing for the terrorist, since his objective was entirely different. Very soon, having dissipated their fears through jokes, life trots back to "normal".
Life is never normal. The only surprising thing about life is that it exists, and the rest is understandable.
Posted by Fadereu on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 at 11:04 PM
i liked it, vinsan. then again, i know him, so i know how he thinks outside the article as well.
and as for foolish, the official commentaries by media and leaders are often far more foolish, unfortunately.
It made complete sense to me.
Now that I've said that, I'll admit I don't get why that wouldn't. I know it is all too complicated to put in a few words for an oursider.
I'll also add that no group shoudl count on my agreement. By the time my opinion might mean anything, you'll have all moved on,
dagmaraka wrote:
Bombay Blasts: Terrorism, Communication & Fashion
on Sunday Shiv Sena made a mockery of itself with the theatre of "statue desecration". Almost every man I have talked with - on the streets, in restaurants and hotels, rickshaw and taxi drivers - believes that terror is almost always an inside job. And yet, the media does not hesitate in pasting the blame on Pakistan, LeT, jihadis, and some such amorphous abstraction. And that abstraction is always a euphemism for Islam.
Nice. I don't know if it's foolish or not, but it does make sense to me. Funny, this shiv sena connection was the first thing that struck me. I haven't read this before - but that was first thing struck me.
But then, I'm as much as an outsider (with regards to Bombay..) as Dag or Osso...
Haven't yet heard from a friend in Mumbai since the blasts. Worried. In her earlier email, she would complain about her connection going down over and over again. Hope that is it.......