Reply
Sun 31 May, 2026 02:10 pm
Short Philosophical Conclusion:
Revelation never contradicts reason.
Reason begins to contradict itself only when it arrogantly demands the Absolute to be positionally dependent on human coordinates.
I. Initial Premise
We consider the text of Revelation as a specific structural type of text possessing three mandatory features:The affirmation of an absolute Leading Principle (God, Truth, Will, the Absolute).The orientation toward a guided human consciousness.The presence of statements that, upon superficial reading, give rise to apparent paradoxes.
II. The Key Cause of Paradoxes
A paradox arises when the Thesis of Positional Dependence (PD-t) is violated:The properties of the Leading (unclosed, absolute) are transferred to the guided,Or, conversely, the properties of the guided (limited, positionally dependent) are attributed to the Leading.
III. The Dissolution of Classical Paradoxes
1. Freedom and Predestination
Error: Confusion of levels.
Dissolution: Predestination belongs to the horizon of the Leading.
Freedom is a form of realization of the guided within this horizon.
They do not contradict each other; rather, they exist in different positional coordinates.
2. Justice and Mercy
Error: The forced closure of categories and the projection of human limitations onto the boundless.
Dissolution: In an unclosed entity, justice and mercy are not competitors, but different manifestations of a single Source.
3. Transcendence and Immanence
Error: Demanding that the Absolute be a "part" of the system.
Dissolution: The Absolute does not enter the system, but manifests within it. Transcendence is His status; immanence is His form of manifestation.
4. Word and Meaning
Error: The identification of human language with Absolute Meaning.
Dissolution: Language is instrumental and positionally dependent.
The word does not contain the Absolute—it merely points to Him.
5. Evil and Perfection
Error: The ontologization of evil as an independent entity.
Dissolution: Evil is not an element of reality, but a deficit in the form of the guided, a consequence of its positional limitation.
IV. Summary Matrix
ParadoxRoot CauseDissolution via PD-tFreedom / PredestinationConfusion of levelsSeparation of coordinatesJustice / MercyClosure of categoriesUnclosed entityTranscendence / ImmanenceModel of inclusionModel of manifestationWord / MeaningIdentification of form and sourceInstrumentality of languageEvil / PerfectionOntologization of deficitPositional limitation of perception
Final Strict Formula:
Paradoxes never belong to the Absolute.They belong exclusively to human thinking, which cowardly forgets its own position.Revelation is not a set of contradictions. It is Light that demands from reason the correct installation of coordinates.
Alın Ak.May
31, 2026World Day of the Kind Word of Thumbelina of Light, which coincides in its great significance with the World No-Tobacco Day.
© Huseyn S. Gurbanov (Maestro of Ontology). All rights reserved.