When was the great pryamid of Giza created?

Archeological, radio-carbon dating and historical records evidence be damned.

Those old fuddy duddy putative scientists with their 2560 BJE beliefs don't even know that god emanated from the energy within the first universe.

God knows how they invent the arrant errant nonsense they call epistemology.

The flood, according to the scriptures, occurred 1,656 after the birth of Adam. Adam died at the age of 930, when his body, within a stone sarcophagus was placed in the mountain where the great stone door opens to receive his body. Imhotep the pyramid builder lived in this time era. This was 726 years before the flood that is said to have destroyed all land animals including Mankind who lived in the great land of Eden, which stretched from England through Africa, north to the frozen SIBERA and east to India.

After the flood, Noah is said to have divided the now uninhabited land of Eden among his three sons, Ham, Shem and Japheth. Ham the first born, received the land of Africa, Japheth the younger of the three, received all the land north of Lebanon and the great islands up to Russia, while Shem, the middle son received the land from the delta of the Nile, north to Lebanon and east to India.

After that, the three sons of Noah divided their land among their sons. The name Mizraim the son of Ham, means EGYPT, and he was given the northern portion of Africa, and it was then, some 730 years after the death of Adam whose body was placed in the mountain where the great stone door opens to receive it, that the land named Egypt was created.

That is clearly a load of old bollocks.

None of these mutterances of yours reflect what is written in the fairy tale you treat as an encyclopaedia (but not quite the word of you know who).

Genesis does not mention a stone coffin for Adam or that Eden is anywhere but the source where one river divides into four near-middle east rivers.

Have you scaped yet again from a maximum security twilight home for the terminally bewildered that incarcerates you for extended periods of blessed relief from your balderbiblebashdash, or is it my imagination?

And you know all of this already so why the charade surrounding your imaginary Creator.

Or the risible and ridiculous emanation of the deity from energy within the first universe (which you've gone a bit quiet on), hmmm?

Plus you throw Noah in the deep end when you know the boat won't float.

Are you from the Moe, Larry or Shemp line?

The Ark, which was a rectangular chest-like floating container built of Kopherwood, which would of necessity, have to be sealed inside and out with bitumen to stop it from leaking, and Kopherwood is simply any wood that is coated with tar/bitumen. The Ark was subject to tides, currents and wind, having no means of propulsion or steerage, it was guided by the hand of the Lord.

Over 2,000 years before George Smith’s discovery of the deluge tablets in Iraq, there existed an account of the Chaldean [pre-Babylonian] flood myth. Berosus, an ancient Chaldean historian living in the time of Alexander the Great in the 4th century B.C.E, relayed to the Greeks the antiquity of his peoples deluge myth in the following words: “After the death of Ardates, his son Xisuthrus reigned eighteen sari. In his time happened a great deluge; the history of which is thus described.

The deity Cronos appeared to him in a vision, and warned him that upon the fifteenth day of the month Daesius there would be a flood, by which mankind be destroyed. He therefore enjoined him to write a history of the beginning, procedure, and conclusion of all things, and to bury it in the city of the sun at Sippara; and to build a vessel, and take with him into it his friends and relations; and to convey on board everything necessary to sustain life, together with all the different animals, [In the area of his known world] both birds and quadrupeds, and trust himself fearlessly to the deep.
Having asked the Deity whither he was to sail, he was answered, “To the Gods;” upon which he offered up a prayer for the good of mankind.

He then obeyed the divine admonition and built a vessel five stadia in length, and two in breadth. Into this he put everything which he had prepared, and last of all conveyed into it his wife, his children and his friends. After the flood had been upon the earth, and was in time abated, Xisuthrus sent out birds from the vessel; which finding no food, nor any place whereupon they might rest their feet, returned to him again. After an interval of some days, he sent them forth a second time; and they now returned with their feet tinged with mud. He made a trial a third time with these birds; but they returned to him no more: from whence he judged that the surface of the earth had appeared above the waters.

He therefore made an opening in the vessel, and upon looking out found that it was stranded upon the side of some mountains; upon which he immediately quitted it with his wife, his children, and the pilot. Xisuhrus then paid his adoration to the earth: and having constructed an altar, offered sacrifices to the Gods.”

It should be noted that the account of the deluge relayed in the tablets discovered by George Smith differ only very slightly from Berosus’ account, which differs only slightly from the story handed down by the Chaldean, Abraham, whose father ‘Terah’ was High Priest in the temple of the Chaldean city of Ur.

The flood of Noah didn’t come as a surprise. It had been preached on for four generations. Something strange happened when Enoch was 65, from which time “He walked with God.” Enoch was given a prophecy that as long as his firstborn son ‘Methuselah’ was alive, the judgement of the flood would be withheld, but as soon as he died, the flood would be sent forth.
Enoch named his firstborn to reflect this prophecy. The name Methuselah comes from two roots: muth, a root that means death, and from shalach, which means ‘To Bring’ or ‘To Send Forth.’ Thus, the name Methuselah signifies, ‘His Death Shall Bring.’ And, indeed, in the year that Methuselah died, the flood came.

Remembering that Abraham was the son of Terah the High priest of the temple in the Chaldean city of Ur, and he was, according to the erroneous Roman OT, 58 when Noah died, the question is now asked, could the Chaldean name ‘Arsates’ mean, ‘When he dies it will happen? And could the name ‘Xisuthrus’ have the same meaning as that of the name ‘Noah’, which is, “One who brings relief or comfort?”

The Chaldean month of Daesius, is the 2nd month, which corresponds with the biblical account that it was in the second month that the flood came. But there is a two-day discrepancy: the biblical account is the 17th day of the second month, [See Genesis 7: 11.] whereas the other is the 15th day of the second month.

These three flood accounts are so similar it becomes obvious that they originated from the one source. Another interesting similarity between the Chaldean deluge story and the one as handed down through the Hebrew, is that before the flood, people lived extraordinary long lives until the god/gods declared that man shall no longer live past a restricted age limit. This signifies that the floods of both cultures mark the same transition in the history of the world, that being, the birth of the modern world.

The more that I am forced to look at the flood accounts, the more I am convinced that some catastrophic event occurred 4,500 years ago, which caused worldwide devastating floods and tsunamis, of which the more accurate account of the flood that devastated the civilized world of that day, can be found in the Hebrew culture that came down from the Chaldean Abraham, and his family, whose language and racial religion have remained intact for over 4,000 years.

More old bollocks.

As always you're deliberately vague unless quoting pre industrial writers.

You mention "a small group of scientists" without mentioning any names or how these "scientists" are qualified, if at all.

What you have is a bunch of religious fanatics cherry picking data in an attempt to shoehorn their religious beliefs in.

And when confronted with questions you can't answer you just cut and paste a load of screed.

It's disingenuous, and pseudo intellectual.

Quote your sources and respond with up to date evidence in simple unambiguous English.

If you can't do that, you don't have anything, just dogma.

check out what the internet says:
Recent studies and speculative theories have suggested that the Great Pyramid may be thousands or even tens of thousands of years older than the traditional date of around 2560 BCE.

Here are the key claims:

Geological weathering suggests extreme age
A 2025–2026 wave of geological studies argues that the limestone blocks show erosion patterns consistent with tens of thousands of years of exposure. One report claims the pyramid’s blocks may have been weathered for “tens of thousands of years” .

Geological weathering suggests extreme age

A 2025–2026 wave of geological studies argues that the limestone blocks show erosion patterns consistent with tens of thousands of years of exposure. One report claims the pyramid’s blocks may have been weathered for “tens of thousands of years.” (MSN)

Some researchers link the pyramids to a catastrophic flood

A team of Italian and Scottish archaeologists claimed the pyramids may have been submerged in a “divine flood,” with the original builders lost — implying a construction date before a major inundation event.

Another group argues for a construction “several millennia earlier”

Egyptian researchers have also suggested the Great Pyramid could be thousands of years older than the accepted Khufu‑era date, based on geological evidence that contradicts the traditional timeline . (The Jerusalem Post)

Don't tell me to do your research for you, you feckless poltroon.

You are the one making these claims, so you need to support them, and you haven't, just more vague unsubstantiated nonsense.

Ah well! Everyone to their own opinion, that's what these forums are all about, are'nt they old mate?

It's not about opinion, it's about claims, and yours are unsubstantiated.

In short you are full of ****.

And here I repeat, "You are welcome to your own [PERSONAL] opinion."