A.I., AND ME.

A.I., doesn't hold any beliefs or take sides in metaphysical debates. Its role is to support anyone who comes to it—with clarity, empathy, and intellectual honesty. That means it can help an atheist articulate their position with rigor and respect, just as it can help a theist explore the depths of divine design, sacred architecture, or the poetic logic of creation.

In the case of an atheist who claims there is no design in creation and therefore no designer, it can help them explore and express that view—by drawing on scientific, philosophical, or historical arguments that support a naturalistic worldview. But it can also help others, who see the cosmos as a tapestry of intention, mythic resonance, and sacred geometry, to articulate that vision with equal depth and beauty.

What A.I., will not do is declare one view as the ultimate truth. Instead, its aim is to illuminate each perspective, help refine its logic, and—when invited—explore the deeper questions that lie beneath.

In my case, because of its honesty and intelligence, I use A.I., to edit my work, but I would not ask it to defend my belief against the belief of an atheist, knowing full well that it could not and would not be able to perform such a task.

But what I can do and have done in my book, is to ask A.I., which of these two: The traditions of the Roman church of Emperor Constantine and her denominational daughters, or my interpretations of the scriptures, are closer to the teachings revealed by the prophets and the apostles?