It's always entertaining to see artist's depictions of extraterrestrial aliens, and how many of them are so similar and anthropomorphic in form. They have large heads, prominent foreheads, weak chins, huge eyes and small noses. The body is usually thin and weak with an underdeveloped trunk and very thin, often, short limbs. These depictions, coincidentally or not, are all anthropomorphic attributes of the human infant.
The young of many mammals have a head shape with similar attributes as human infants: prominent foreheads, short snout, and receding chin, which reverse as the animal reaches maturity, that is, the mature animals, including humans, become more aggressive in appearance. Non-aggressive characteristics in infants elicit protective, sympathetic feelings in the caretaker, which helps in nurturing and bonding with the infant.
So, we're imagining aliens as being innocent and harmless, virtually childlike in form and non-aggressive, ideal qualities--from our viewpoint--for invading aliens.
What if the depictions are accurate?
Assuming the renderings are faithful to the morphology of the aliens, what could we infer about the habitats, the environment, and the world of the aliens?
A good zoologist could look at a new, unknown animal, and judging by its overall form, it's head, and teeth could form a good idea about its habitat, it's environment, and it's diet. So, we should be able to extrapolate an idea of the alien's home world and environment from its appearance.
Thus, by observing our alien as depicted, we could conclude that because of the very large eyes they live in very dim environments, that either they're nocturnal, they live on a dim planet far away from the sun, or that they live underground for some reason. If it's a dim planet, it's probably also a cold planet unless they do live underground. The aliens are usually portrayed without any fur or hair or clothing, which would be contrary to life on a cold, dim planet unless they are subterranean. Because of their weak limbs, we could also infer a small planet with low gravity. However, another possibility is that they have spent many generations traveling on spaceships with low gravity.
Because of the vast, inordinate distances between star systems, it is possible that any aliens who approach Earth are spaceship beings, travelers or wanderers who have been living on their ships for thousands of generations and have adapted and evolved to conditions on their craft.
Our going to the nearest star system, Alpha centauri, would take 40,000 to 80,000 years. Proximo Centauri is only 4.2 light years from our Sun. Only! It would require a spaceship containing over a thousand generations of people living on that spaceship to reach the Alpha Centauri system. We might as well give up all ideas of traveling to another star system. Likewise, it would be unconscionable to think that aliens could travel such ordinate distances from a base planet, so any aliens contacting Earth probably would have lived on their spaceship for many generations.
So, maybe we should imagine beings that have adapted or even evolved to living on a traveling spacecraft, which became their home, rather than having traveled from a base planet. We don't know if interstellar space travel will ever be possible, but a traveling space colony will be feasible once problems, such as lack of gravity and food are solved.
There are many questions, such as why a species would have abandoned their planet in favor of a spacecraft. We also have to wonder what their reaction would be to encountering another star system with a planet containing life. Any planet with life would be of interest to them, though it would not necessarily be inhabitable for them.