Tue 29 Nov, 2022 10:33 am
TREE (3) is too large to notate directly, too large to comprehend, too large for physics to describe. Any math shows us it exists. Some math conjectures and theorems and proofs can take on a quasi-religious status as examples. Tree(3) is one of these examples. You've got all these physical processes going on in the universe all around you. None of them are anything compared to Tree(3). It is so enormous that it is beyond our ability to express with written notation; bigger than the notoriously garguntuam Graham's number. We know TREE (3) exists, and we know it's finite, but we do not know how many digits there are. TREE(3) is so incomprehensibly massive that no human can ever visualize it, understand it, or conceptualize it. TREE (3), for all intent and purposes, which is accessible by human consciousness and the physical limits of our universe, is much the same as infinity. This number is so big that if you were to write one digit on each atom in the entire universe, you would run out of atoms before making any significant change in TREE (3). TREE (3) is so astounding, not only in terms of size, but also in terms of derivation, mainly because the way to get to it is quite simplistic, and in no way hints the number is so large. Graham's number is practically equivalent to zero when compared to TREE (3). TREE (3) is a finite number, but large enough to be incomputable. The term astronomical is often used to describe something too large to comprehend. TREE (3) goes beyond astronomical. TREE (3) is so big that it's full written form couldn't be stored in the observable universe.