2
   

On the fiscal responsibility of Australian rabbits...

 
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 10:23 am
I think I just got my rocks off! Razz Cool Twisted Evil
Them are big and beautiful - wow!
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 02:44 pm
Rocks in the head!

More rocks - Kata Tjuta - the Olgas


http://www.idsia.ch/~marcus/australia/olgas.jpg
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 03:11 pm
hey, those are sexy. crazy old, old rocks you've got in australia. old rocks and animals and bacteria and -- wanna pay for my airfare?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 03:18 pm
Any idea how old they are? c.i.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 03:45 pm
Quote:
THE EVOLUTIONARY ?'HISTORY'
Most geologists believe that between about 900 and 600 million years ago, much of Central Australia lay at or below sea-level, forming a depression, an arm of the sea, known as the Amadeus Basin. Rivers carried mud, sand and gravel into the depression, building up layers of sediment. Other types of sedimentary rocks also formed. Then, they say, about 550 million years ago, in the so-called Cambrian Period, the south-western margin of the Amadeus Basin was raised above sea-level, the rocks were squeezed, crumpled and buckled into folds, and fractured along faults in a mountain-building episode.

During the late stages of this episode, ?'rapid' erosion carved out the Petermann and Musgrave Ranges. The Uluru Arkose and Mount Currie Conglomerate are the products of this erosion, being deposited in separate so-called alluvial fans. Though uniformitarian (slow-and-gradual) geologists believe the arkose and conglomerate were deposited ?'relatively rapidly', they still allow up to 50 million years for the occasional flash floods to have scoured the mountain ranges south and west of the Uluru area and carried the rubble many tens of kilometres out on to the adjoining alluvial flats. Thus in two separate deposits, layer upon layer of arkose and conglomerate accumulated respectively.

By about 500 million years ago, it is claimed, the region was again covered by a shallow sea and the alluvial fans of Uluru Arkose and Mount Currie Conglomerate were gradually buried beneath layers of sand, silt, mud and limestone. Then about 400 million years ago a new period of folding, faulting and uplift began and supposedly continued for around 100 million years. the layers of Uluru Arkose and Mount Currie Conglomerate, which had been buried by hundreds or even thousands of metres of younger Amadeus Basin sediments, were strongly folded and faulted. The originally horizontal Uluru Arkose layers were rotated into a nearly vertical position, while the Mount Currie Conglomerate at Kata Tjuta was only tilted 10-18o.

It is thus believed that the Uluru - Kata Tjuta area has probably remained above sea-level since that time - for some 300 million years. Initially the land surface would have been much higher than the top of Uluru and Kata Tjuta, but as erosion continued, today's shapes of Uluru and Kata Tjuta were gradually carved out. By 70 million years ago the area was covered in forests indicating a very wet, tropical environment. Today's arid climate and desert sands have only developed since the very recent ?'ice age', a few thousand years ago.


http://biblicalstudies.qldwide.net.au/cs-uluru_and_kata_tjuta.html
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 03:51 pm
Umm, what are we to make of the rest of that link, Bill?
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 03:55 pm
Quote:
CONCLUSION
The evidence overall does not fit the story of evolutionary geologists, with its millions of years of slow-and-gradual processes. Instead, the evidence in the rock layers at Uluru and Kata Tjuta is much more consistent with the scientific model based on a recent, rapid, massive, catastrophic flood, such as that of Noah's day. Uluru and Kata Tjuta are therefore stark testimony to the raging waters of the global Flood, as in the eye witness record in the book of Genesis.


You never know, do you - hmmmmmmmmm! Smile
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 03:56 pm
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and
He is less remote from the truth who believes nothing than
He who believes what is wrong."
-Thomas Jefferson (Notes on Virginia, 1782)
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:01 pm
Lucky thing l don't let my beliefs interfer with my thinking - huh? Smile
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:04 pm
I don't know enough about geology or the writer's credentials in its study to venture an argument, Bill, so mum's the word.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:14 pm
pd, he ain't here to argue and I am on your side, so it wouldn't do any good any way - unless, oh, nevermind! Smile
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:19 pm
I'm a diehard Creationist, Bill.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:22 pm
I haven't died hard or soft yet, so you must be talking to me from above! Cool
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:24 pm
I'm not sure if the phrase means dies hard -- is hard to kill -- or if it refers to the hardness of a die of the sort you use to put threads on a bolt. They are very, very hard, and maintain their shape even when enormous pressure is applied. I suspect it may be the latter. Maybe I'll go look that up...
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:26 pm
See you when you return, hope you don't have an evolutionary change before you get back!
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:28 pm
Nope. I'm wrong. It's the obvious origin (or so the OED would have it).



Hmmm, my liver is now enormous and working at three times its normal speed. It looks like LaMarck was right about the evolution thing after all (or do I have to wait to see if my kids have giant, speedy livers, too?).
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:30 pm
Never wrong, in a state of flux - Smile
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:32 pm
Always becoming, eh, Bill?

Bill's a Buddhist! Buddha Bill!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:38 pm
No, just a welder! Though I like that - a buddha

http://www.geographyinaction.co.uk/Assets/Photo_albums/One/images/Buddha_jpg.jpg

http://www.geographyinaction.co.uk/

Thanks for use of this magnificent picture of the Buddha!
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 11 Apr, 2003 04:39 pm
Heah, there's another rock, ohmmmmmmmmm! Life must be like a rock!!!!!! ohmmmmmmmmmm
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2026 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 03/03/2026 at 11:23:35