Critique of the Very Notion of “Law” via Sartrean Existential Ontology

Critique of the Very Notion of “Law” via Sartrean Existential Ontology

The concept that legislative; judicial; prosecutorial; and police officials are set to incriminate persons by “law”, is an existentially dishonest ilk of governmental misconception, in the sense that it is ontologically fallacious to presume given published “legal” language is a living movent force, causally constitutive of human determination to act to invoke “law”, enforce “law’’, or, to punish persons by “law”.
Baruch Spinoza’s (1634-1677) “Omnis determinatio est negatio.” 1674, (“ All determination is negation.”), describes the negative originative source of human determination to act, and, limits the origination of all human action to being strictly a function of the doubly nihilative structure of the conscious intent to enact a prefigured future.
Jean Paul Sartre’s 1943 explication of Spinoza’s dictum, in terms of the process of “double nihilation”, constitutes defeasement of man’s ”by law” conception of the origin of legal action, (which doubly nihilitive human action origination current jurisprudence lacks the intellectual instrumentation to recognize), hence, American human freedom of action remains ignorantly subjugate to a fraudulent language of law, which ”law” entails no comprehension of the sole ontological originative modus operandi of a human act.
“Law” absolutely is not determinative of human action/inaction, for “law” is merely a given linguistic construct, while, all the while, all human determination to action is strictly a function of the doubly negative nihilative structure of conscious human ontological intentionality.