Mass, Curvature of Spacetime, Inertia, And Gravity

As a hard SciFi writer, San Diego Floating Airport Series on Amazon KDP, I've researched online and in my college studies, what constitutes Inertia and Gravity.
Based on integrating the various explanations and throwing out the contradictive elements, I've arrived at some conclusions:
1. No one will ever find a "Graviton" or gravitic force particle for the Standard Model; since Gravity describes the result of a Mass' combined Electromagnetism, weak force, and strong force. These forces in combination cause spacetime to warp and the curvature(s) causes separate masses to follow the curvature (the larger curvature overwhelming the smaller) into the to point of greatest distortion caused by the larger mass.
2. Centrifugal force is the effect of an area of mass' warped spacetime (gravity well) in which another moving mass tends to alter its straight-line course towards the center of the first mass' spacetime curvature (gravity well). If the moving mass' relative weight and speed, approach the right distance to the larger mass' warped spacetime, an equilibrium (between the two masses' warped spacetimes) can be achieved and the smaller mass will orbit within the larger mass' warped spacetime.

This brings me to a question. Has anyone found proof that a moving mass has a distorted (nonconcentric) region of warped spacetime?

If when a mass moves the warped spacetime around the mass tends to have a steeper curve in the direction of travel and a less steep curve in the direction opposite the direction of travel then inertia and the Alcubierre warp bubble may be essentially the same effect. Which means, the movement of mass below the speed of light is limited due to relativity as mass approaches infinity and energy diminishes to zero. What Alcubierre proposes requires pushing past this point in relativity by finding a way of projecting a combination of electromagnetism and Bosons to form an artificial mass in front of the objective mass. This projection would cause an artificial singularity to form further compressing the objective mass' warped spacetime beyond the boundary of relativity, and the area around the objective mass would become a separate "bubble" of spacetime which could now be able to move at velocities independent of relativity and the objective mass would be contained within this independent bubble of spacetime with a relative speed of zero.

If this line of logic seems consistent with latest explanations of inertia and gravity then I would appreciate verification or comments that provide insight into where the line of logic goes astray. I'm pretty confident of everything, up to where I believe the Alcubierre warp bubble might occur; and a method of projecting the necessary forms of energy+guage bosons to create a singularity.

If any of the last parts of my logic is valid, then the SciFi writer, Ian Douglas's Singularity Drive falls into the category of SciFi concepts that may very well become engineering reality is the future.