0
   

Could the assumption that the double slit being described by interference like water waves be wrong?

 
 
Reply Sun 29 Mar, 2020 09:21 am
Are there two waves in the double slit experiment or is the diffraction pattern simply the quantum field (medium) causing a single cohered wave to land where it does?

This ends all other interpretations.

If a wave is going through both slits ..it is the same wave, not two separate waves. Interference isn't happening. It's just the path the quantum field assigns when there is a double slit.

The bare vertical gaps are a shadow of the sliver between the double slits. A path of diffraction is much stronger for a coherent wave. The gaps in the pattern is repeating the use of the sliver several times.

The physical water waves doing a double slit was just a coincidence.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 166 • Replies: 1
No top replies

 
pittsburghjoe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Mar, 2020 08:10 am
@pittsburghjoe,
Can we prove the sliver between slits in the double slit is projected onto the final panel by changing the slivers shape? I know the distance between slits is important but is there any wiggle room? Would this kill the idea of wave interference?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Could the assumption that the double slit being described by interference like water waves be wrong?
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/20/2021 at 06:02:35