0
   

Contract Case Needs Explanation

 
 
Reply Sun 4 Jun, 2017 12:36 pm
Fred Gore, under the name of M.R.B. was engaged in developing and marketing computer software for controlling feeding programs for dairy cattle. Marvin Marshall went to work for M.R.B under a contract that provided that after termination of the employment, Marshall would not engage for 2 years in the business of developing or marketing computer software or in any business that competed with M.R.B. Marshall left the employment for M.R.B. to work for IBM developing a remotely operated keyboard. Should M.R.B. prevail in preventing Marvin from working at IBM? What issues are involved?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 293 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
centrox
 
  1  
Reply Sun 4 Jun, 2017 01:03 pm
Is this your homework?
0 Replies
 
ekename
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jun, 2017 07:32 am
@benjaminmeth,
Cow of a question that behooves all parties to act responsibly what heifer happens.

In the meat market that is the beef cake biz all will be re vealed if some mad (bovine spongeiform encephalopathetic) cow milks Marshall for the feeding program codes and gains access using a keyboard however remote the chance.

You wagyu , are you thinking MRB should add ALE to the feed, get hot and score with a new brand: MARBLE?
0 Replies
 
tsarstepan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 5 Jun, 2017 12:01 pm
@benjaminmeth,
This has literally got to be the first prelaw or even first law school grad homework anyone as ever propositioned us to help cheat on at a2k.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Contract Case Needs Explanation
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.3 seconds on 05/05/2025 at 06:27:28