@Aliesending,
"Feel free to elaborate more on this"
- every perceivable notion exists in fully accounted for manifestation as a Notion. It has no physical bearing, or relativity to reality, but It factually exists in an entire and fully developed concept, accounting for all variables, via various Notions.
The Catalyst for Creation.
Time as perceived and measured is not what the "theoretical" term for time is; No - agreed. But I cannot say there is any scientific accuracy to your, statement that "reality is being manifested by solid light particles", no.
IN Computing, DATA does not SIMPLY stop existing in one place and begin existing in another. It is transferred, through carefully calculated algorithms. The transferring of the data can easily be tracked, recorded.. and well IS, recorded in it's relocating. It does not cease, ever. And in fact the data does not change dimensions either - it is always in the same format, computing.
anyways. The fact was, NO, there is by no means by which the science can be done in any QUANTUM reality by which teleportation or time travel can be achieved. The algorithm is impossible.
The theoretical NOTION of a Quantum universe where such things were achieved is an instable existence which DID not get created in Manifestation. Because the idea cannot accumulatively be accounted for: hence. Because the Quantum notion that the technology came from another universe into that one where you theorize the math can be done, would inevitably lead to an over-all overhaul of the cosmos *"[ Your idea of Quantum's, also impedes upon our universe: The full entirety of Cosmological instability regarding Quantum mechanics intertwining]{proving they have no physical manifestation}(we are in the singular UNIVERSE /"everything in one place".))*
~regardless of course, because YOU cannot transfer the entirety of the UNIVERSE with you in time, or relocate yourself to an impossibly traceable location in time. The movement of energy is simply too spiratical and unaccounted for as a whole to do such a none sense thing as an algorithm for it.
Anyways. It was a pleasure Aliesending, But This is Gordon Fiala, ArcThomas, You can't present such BS to me as stipulably being fact; the math has been done and accounted for.
why do you bother? |:; cause: you do not seem to accurately perceive simple logistics.