Reply
Fri 27 Mar, 2015 01:14 pm
Hey there!
I'm currently editing a story for a friend, and I've come across a few instances where he has used nonessential elements immediately after a conjunction, which leads me to my question. Should these nonessential elements be set off by a comma after the conjunction as well as at the end of the element, or is it sufficient to only have a comma at the element's end?
I'll provide an example for clarification:
A) Maybe John could have gotten a sense of things if he could see, but, with the darkness, he couldn't even tell if he was where he'd been before.
OR
B) Maybe John could have gotten a sense of things if he could see, but with the darkness, he couldn't even tell if he was where he'd been before.
Personally, I've always done option A in my writings, due to my understanding of there being a pause after the conjunction, but I figured it couldn't hurt to get some outside opinion before I go through changing things.
Thanks,
Expoh
@Expoh,
Expoh there's a trend way from the comma except where essential to meaning
Maybe John could have gotten a sense of things if he could see, but with the darkness he couldn't even tell if he was where he'd been before
Without: "…see but with the darkness…" might momentarily suggest things he could see except for the darkness
Very subtle. Help, Con, Mac, S., etc