Ramses II: the 500 years error in Egyptian history

Here we go again watching a new movie about the biblical event known as the exodus.

And again, the characters Moses and Ramses are put together, implying that Ramses became the pharaoh who imposed slavery to the Israelites and who suffered the ten plagues that destroyed the Egyptian empire.

Sadly, ignorance rules not only in the script of the new Hollywood movie, but also in several books, preaching and publications made about this event.

Apparently, the confusion seems to be caused by the mention of a land named the Land of Ramses in the book of Exodus. But, such a land was named as such since the times of the first pharaoh called Ramses.

When the event of the exodus of the Israelites happened, the name of the pharaoh surely wasn't Ramses, and less was the great Egyptian pharaoh mentioned in the books of history the one who received such a punishment from the god of the Israelites.

The name Land of Ramses is similar to say in our days Washington DC, which won't necessarily means that the owner or ruler of this city is a person named Washington. It is just the name of the land, that's all.

According to latest research, the number of pharaohs since the birth of Moses were about fourteen. And the names of the pharaohs are partially listed and shown in the book "Pharaohs and Kings, a Biblical Quest" written by David M. Rohl.

Going a little further, in the 1950's, a book that became the best seller in New York, "Worlds in Collision" by Immanuel Velikovsky, not only found the chronological 500 years error on the Egyptian historical records, but in parallel as a corollary the error expanded to the history of Greece as well.

It is laughable to hear from historians, that Homer didn't write the Odyssey
but that his two books were "transmitted orally for 500 years through generations and that someone wrote them in paper after the five centuries".

This idea also applies to a weird phenomenon of "no writings" for 500 years in the Greek culture. This is a consequence for trying to coordinate the error in the Egyptian history no make it fit with the chronology of the Greek culture.

The whole thing is a mess because historians reject the recognition of their error.

According to David Kohl findings, the name of the pharaoh when the biblical exodus took place was Dudemose. This is and educated guess but it shows that the great Ramses of the Egyptian history was born 500 years later.

And Ramses II is the Egyptian pharaoh who had confrontations with another great leader, the Babylonian Nebuchadnezzar. Hard to believe it, but the chronology of wars between Egypt and Babylon is more accurate than the accepted chronology given by historians that is full of gaps.

Ramses II is not the pharaoh who was confronted by the biblical Moses, and even when for many the story of the Exodus is just an imaginary event, still the current chronology in history is in error, and by continuing its acceptance is to believe in imaginary events as well, because to say that Ramses II existed 500 years before his real birth is just pure imaginations.