Reproduction (not smutty)

Don't see why that should seem so unusual

That's understandable by many of us who (1) much prefer the real thing, or (2) nonetheless enjoy the occasional undergarment flyer ad, for the titillation however brief

Certain denominations might so label it

If you'e asking our permission I'm sure almost all of us would most freely grant it, as I'm sure would most of our various gods

But to assure us you're not a bot and so we might better address your concerns: if we knew something more about you--without revealing anything critical to your ID--eg, age, sex, ed., nationality, religion, family, work, motives, etc

I'm a female feminist of the old school. I don't presume you would agree with me on anything except by misunderstanding, and I have a hard time agreeing with you on anything at all. You seem to take whole populations as swaths of like minds.

I'm not interested in pornography, which seems at first glance to be for the needy, but I understand people drawn to it, liking it.

You don't find naked bodies attractive? Any of them? That sounds like hysteric denial - or, maybe you are actually asexual. I'll guess the first one.
Has anyone ever told you that attraction to other bodies is normal? the human experience?

This might be the strangest set of sentences I've ever seen:
" Is sexual interecourse 3D pornography, when reproduction is not reason for the sex? After all, each involved performs the intercourse mainly for self pleasure (the partner is used to gain pleasure), as a rule."

It follows then that
A) you totally lack empathy to other humans, or
B) you'll make a great pope.

Your take on humanity seems mechanistic. Instead of berating you repeatedly, I wonder how you formed all these opinions - if they are a construct, or how you genuinely think, or feel.

Greetings, Genuine answer - I hate bodily fluids from urinary areas. I can take blood OK, but I think it is because intercourse involves areas near urine output. I had a relative who never washed his hands after urination. Intercourse lasts a short time, but a Chinese meal................ (isn't a longer sensation of pleasur better? I don't like food not touched by others though, unless fdorced to. The other reason is, as a male, a woman's face can be stunningly beautiful. The male reproductive system looks like it has not evolved with beauty in mind. If possible, Shouldn't women be regarded more than an object of pleasure There is a book on grammer called "Eats Roots and Leaves". There is a joke about sexual matters in Australia which implies "Roots, Shits and Leaves" is a male code of sexual conduct ("Roots" being a slang word for sex). Would you like a man to think of women in those terms? Also, some adult Brits are prudish about sex. I have witnessed adult students go bright red at human repoduction lectures.

"You seem to take whole populations as swaths of like minds."

that's OK. But most Catholics think they may be are right (otherwise they would change). Most Communists probably they are right. Many Republicans think they are right. Many Socialists think they are probably right. Don't many people believe their creed offers the best "End of line offers". Many Americans believe their country is best. Many Swiss believe their nation is better - masses of small weapons but next to no crime, and their politicians are forced to follow majority opinions. Many Brits would like to open the front door and leave (opinion poll). How does one quantify how good a country?

How would you describe old fashioned feminist?

Also, do you agree that 1 + 1 = 2. A follows B, There should be a "s" after "Math" (joke).". Bohr and Rutherford are undervalued? Don't you think there should be a spelling checker here?

Urine hate, that's a new one on me.

I simply don't share your views and find them hard to understand.