@joefromchicago,
Well, your point about creating an economic mess for the troops to return home to has some credence, but your assessment of a simple "thank you" as being an empty gesture is cynical and just not backed up by my experience.
I should point out that I don't say "thank you" enough to our men and women in uniform but as I spend a lot of time in airports I see many instances of it, and in every single case the service man or woman seems genuinely appreciative. Obviously I can't read their minds but I can read their faces and I have to believe that if it was an empty gesture as you suggest I would have read resentment in at least one of the faces.
In addition I have asked the seven people in my family who serve and everyone of them have told me they appreciate a simple "thank you" very much.
Many of the soldiers I have spoken with tend to perceive expressions of opposition to the wars in which they serve or have served as a lack of support for them. Some recognize that a person can can oppose a war and still have high regard for " the troops" who fight in them, but they still take it personally, because they don't want to think that they are risking their lives in a war the folks back home don't support.
Obviously, this is purely anecdotal evidence and I don't offer it as broad proof, but it certainly informs my opinion.
Interestingly enough, not one of the folks I've spoken with suggested that they would feel supported more if taxes back home were increased to pay for their
war.
The notion of shared sacrifice is probably of greater importance to a conscripted military than an all volunteer force.
I will acknowledge that in order to provide these men and women with the greater financial security they deserve, the government requires more cash.
I prefer, however, to see that cash recognized through cutting spending rather than raising taxes. Only someone who believes the government can never spend less than it does believes that increased taxes are the only answer.