Neutrino faster than light

This was resolved some time ago. The neutrino result was erroneous due to a timing measurement in the experiment.

Nothing travels faster than light. The light speed limit is fundamental to the structure of our universe in relation to matter and energy.

Thank you Ros for that report. I should have spennt more time scrolling Google

Yes I understand how that's supposed to work, as an object gets disproportionally massive as its velocity increases and of course infinite at c, so of course can't be further accelerated

The relativistic changes have always intrigued me because they're so inexplicable. Of course mathematically they hold together very nicely but they nonetheless puzzle intuition. For instance what's unique about c

In other words, why c and not some other value. I do have a kind of weird notion to help explain it and to account for the other effects such as shrinkage and time dilation but won't pursue it here since it hasn't proven very pop

But thanks again for setting me straight, that neutrino business was indeed kind of troubling

Out curiosity though and to save me the scrolling, if it's not beyond the understanding of the average Clod (me), just what sort of error was it

Something about the clocks they were using not being synchronized right I think. I don't really remember off hand.

attaching to A2K

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light

Another quote from this wiki article:

So fellas what's the conclusion

I stopped when they started banging everything together to see how many different sizes of debris they could map, though when they present a polarity chart and cross reference it against antimatter as a linear parallel to reality with polar intermediacy, I may very well raise an eyebrow again.

Bed for the headache I think.

D.