0
   

Is U.S. Energy Independence Finally Within Reach?

 
 
Reply Wed 7 Mar, 2012 09:41 am
Is U.S. Energy Independence Finally Within Reach?
by John Ydstie - NPR Morning Edition
March 7, 2012

Rising gas prices have been the big energy story of the past several weeks. But many energy experts say that's a sideshow compared with the really big energy event — the huge boom in oil and natural gas production in the U.S. that could help the nation reach the elusive goal of energy independence.

Since the Arab oil embargo of 1973, energy independence has been a Holy Grail for virtually every American president from Richard Nixon to Jimmy Carter to Barack Obama.

But now, it might just be within reach.

The Shale Gale

"Energy self-sufficiency is now in sight," says energy economist Phil Verleger. He believes that within a decade, the U.S. will no longer need to import crude oil and will be a natural gas exporter.

What's Behind These High Gas Prices?

Verleger says all of the previous presidents fighting for energy independence would be quite surprised by how this came about: It's not the result of government policy or drilling by big oil.

"This is really the classic success of American entrepreneurs," he says. "These were people who saw this coming, managed to assemble the capital and go ahead."

Small energy companies using such controversial techniques as hydraulic fracturing, along with horizontal drilling, are unlocking vast oil and natural gas deposits trapped in shale in places like Pennsylvania, North Dakota and Texas. North Dakota, for instance, now produces a half-million barrels a day of crude oil, and production is rising.

Amy Myers Jaffe, of Rice University's Baker Institute, also believes U.S. energy self-sufficiency is within reach.

"I would say we're the closest to being able to fashion a policy that would get us to energy self-sufficiency in decades," she says.

That policy would include continuing the green light on developing shale oil and gas, she says, while making sure it is done in an environmentally safe manner and continuing to require higher fuel efficiency in cars and trucks.

"This shale gale, I describe it as the energy equivalent of the Berlin Wall coming down. This is a big deal," says Robin West, chairman and CEO of PFC Energy, who has been in the energy consulting business for decades.

Foreign Oil Imports Drop As U.S. Drilling Ramps Up

The Pulitzer Prize-winning author considers the global implications of American energy production.

"We estimate that by 2020, the U.S. overall will be the largest hydrocarbon producer in the world; bigger than Russia or Saudi Arabia," he says.

While West says it's a transformative event, he doesn't say the U.S. will be energy independent. He does say, however, that the U.S. will likely end up with energy security because most of its oil imports will come from Canada, not unstable places like the Middle East.

The other game changer, West argues, is a big boost for the U.S. economy from affordable electricity produced by cheap natural gas. West says it will help revitalize U.S. manufacturing, and energy economist Verleger agrees.

"We'll have an energy advantage in almost every area," he says, "and it will be a clean energy advantage ... And it will be an advantage that the Chinese can't or no country can quickly capture."

Verleger says it will probably take a couple of decades for other countries to exploit their shale gas resources because they can't easily re-create the recipe of entrepreneurship, property rights and financing that led to the U.S. shale boom.

Other Options Available

There are skeptics, however, such as Dan Kammen, a professor in the energy and resource group at the University of California, Berkeley.

"Just simply mining our fossil fuel resources to try to get to 100 percent ... in a decade or two decades — I think really takes us in the wrong direction," Kammen says.

For instance, he says that although some natural gas is much cleaner than coal, it's not all created equal. Some gas has a dirty environmental footprint when mining techniques are factored in, and he says there's a better and cleaner way to get an economic boost.

"The real question is can we build the industry base so that we are not only using our own solar, wind and other renewable resources, but we're exporting those technologies; and that's where the big economic prize is," he says.

Furthermore, even if the U.S. produces most or all of its own crude, Kammen says, oil will remain a global commodity with a global price. Because of that, U.S. businesses and consumers will not be immune to price shocks.

West, Jaffe and Verleger don't dispute that lack of immunity, but say those price shocks will become less damaging as consumers move to higher-mileage vehicles — some that might run on cheap natural gas, or on electricity produced by that gas.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 915 • Replies: 9
No top replies

 
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2012 09:24 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Report Shows Drop In U.S. Oil Imports
March 12, 2012
by Scott Neuman - NPR

The White House will unveil a report today showing that U.S. dependence on foreign oil imports has dropped by more than two million barrels a day since President Obama took office.

The report shows U.S. imports at 8.4 million barrels a day last year from 11 million barrels a day in 2008. As a percent of all U.S. consumption, foreign imports went from 57 percent down to 45 percent in the same period, the report says.

With prices topping $4 a gallon at the pump, the politics of oil is already shaping up to become a major issue this campaign season, with President Obama forced to defend his energy policy against Republicans who blame him for blocking a major U.S.-Canada pipeline project.

Monday's report, entitled "The Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future" touts White House policies to promote more fuel efficient cars and improved weatherization in homes as major factors in reducing the imports.

Neela Banerjee reports in The Los Angeles Times today that:

GOP candidates on the campaign trail and some oil industry leaders have charged that Obama's energy policies stifle domestic production, and have urged the administration to open as much public land and offshore areas as possible to drilling.

More domestic drilling will not end the need for imports, however. The United States holds only 2% of the planet's proven oil reserves, but Americans consume 25% of the world's daily output of crude oil.

Meanwhile, as Kirk Siegler from member station KUNC reports, a boom in domestic oil drilling has boosted demand for oil and gas engineers.

According to the latest Lundberg survey of gas stations nationwide, the average price for a gallon of regular is now $3.81, up 12 cents in the last two weeks.

If you want to see what's behind high gas prices, NPR has an excellent graphic to explain it.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Mon 12 Mar, 2012 09:41 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Taking a Bite Out Of Energy Consumption
March 11, 2012
by Sheril Kirshenbaum - NPR

While the United States is home to just five percent of the global population, we consume a whopping 20 percent of the world's energy. With a seemingly endless appetite for fuel and concern over the stability of import supplies, everyone seems to be looking for a practical domestic solution. While presidential candidates, political pundits and the nation's top engineers debate options such as offshore drilling, hydraulic fracturing, renewables and the Keystone pipeline, they're ignoring one obvious way to save energy now: reduce the amount of food we waste.

Consider: the production and distribution of food in the U.S. currently accounts for at least 10 percent of our energy consumption. That's because energy is consumed with every step of the process. We move water for irrigation, disperse fertilizer and pesticides, and work the land with industrial-size machinery. Then there's the processing, packaging, sorting, stocking and transportation. In fact, according to the most recent estimate, each item of food travels, on average, over 1,500 miles to your plate by land, sea or air.

Here's the important part: between one-quarter and one-third of what's produced gets discarded before reaching us. In other words, a lot of food never completes that long journey. Wasted food is wasted energy.

There's food that spoils in restaurants, and in our own refrigerators. There are the edible and nutritious, yet superficially blemished, fruits and vegetables deemed unsuitable for display at the grocery store. And then there are the left-overs from our unnecessarily super-sized portions, regularly emptied into trash bins.

It all adds up. According to a recent article out of the University of Texas at Austin — where I work — at least 2 percent of the total energy consumed in the United States was simply thrown away in 2007 in the form of food waste. That's equivalent to the energy contained in hundreds of millions of barrels of oil.

Let me repeat that. A very conservative research study estimated we threw away 2 percent of the amount of energy consumed in this country. Really. Furthermore, what gets wasted is costly as well. The average U.S. family spends about $600 a year on food that will not ever be consumed.

Of course, we can't recover all that's lost. We can't even come close. But the numbers should force us to recognize that it's time to change the way Americans produce and distribute food. That means investing in better farming practices, increased agricultural research and dedicated programs to educate consumers about food choices that will save them money.

Will it be easy? Of course not. But the tremendous international efforts currently undertaken to keep us powered up — energy exploration, research, and development — aren't exactly a piece of cake either. So, if we truly value energy in this country, we have to figure out how to save more and waste less.
---------------------------------

Guest blogger Sheril Kirshenbaum writes frequently on the relationship between science and culture. She is also director of The Energy Poll at The University of Texas at Austin.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 11:23 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Oil Prices Fall On Reports About Emergency Reserves
by The Associated Press
March 15, 2012

Oil prices are falling on reports that Britain and the United States will release oil from government-controlled emergency reserves.

News organizations reported Thursday that the two countries will try to knock down oil prices by releasing spare supply on the market. High oil prices have helped push gasoline in the U.S. to the highest price ever for this time of year, $3.82 per gallon. Experts predict the national average could reach as high as $4.25 per gallon by late next month.

The U.S. released oil from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve in August with only limited success. Prices dipped for just a few days.

Benchmark crude gave up $1.28 to $104.25 per barrel in New York while Brent crude dropped by $2.17 to $122.37 per barrel in London.
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 11:31 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
Limbo is calling all of this a lie being perped by the Dems. Actually, I changed over to a natural gas system in the Buswh W years becase of the technology available in 2001.
The only bad lining is that the gas fields are being capped because gas prices are so low and the return on drilling is shrinking.
So we will sit it out ntil gas once again rises in price and everyone will blame the sitting president (each party will criticize the other in the hopes that AMericus stupidus bys it)
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 12:39 pm
@farmerman,
Funniest darn thing happened Saturday on the way back from Albuquerque. As I got close to home, I saw a drillling rig operating off the the west. The San Juan Basin is predominately a collection of gas fields, and this rig was set up for 24 hour operation. That's an expensive way to drill, gas prices are down, so what the heck are they doing?
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 01:19 pm
@roger,
some secondary gas recovery is being done on old wells as a "cleanup" . Maybe thats what they were attempting. Dunno, Im just giessing.
They would need a rig to backpull some casing too. Was it a drill or a perforating setup?
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 01:28 pm
@farmerman,
While being a mile or more away from the highway, I could clearly see it was a drill rig, not workover or completion equipment. They just had to be drilling, so far as I know. Around here, existing wells are perfed by the little wireline rigs, at least for cementing on plug and abandon jobs.

I'm not clear on where the drilling operation leaves off and completion rigs take over, but in this area, drill rigs are only used for drilling new holes. They would never be used for secondary stimulation, or repairs. Keep in mind that our wells are neither extremely deep, nor very large bore. With some exceptions, the production tubing tends to run to 2 7/8".

Edit to add "tubing".
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 01:48 pm
@roger,
well, you know the rigs so Im stomped. They coulda been reaming or doing some prop sand pumping at the production zones. OR maybe the cheap price hasnt hit you guys yet(emoticon spittin tabacca juice)
roger
 
  1  
Reply Thu 15 Mar, 2012 02:20 pm
@farmerman,
Could be right about the region not being hit by the low prices yet. I drove by my previous employer last week and there were no rigs in the yard. That's a good sign, though they have always been heavily involved in Plug & Abandon operations - which is not optional on the part of the production companies. BLM will only permit them to shut in a well for a certain amount of time before they require the well to be either plugged, or returned to production. Of course, not all wells are on BLM land.
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Is U.S. Energy Independence Finally Within Reach?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 08:25:21