0
   

2012 New Year greetings" UN"(2012年新年贺词“联合国的末日”)

 
 
81-41
 
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2012 01:56 am
2012 New Year greetings" UN"

The so-called" United Nations" from the text perspective should be with the world peace as the goal of the organization. We have a look at the" principles and purposes of the United nations".

First, the maintenance of international peace and security.

Two, the development of international respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination based on friendly relations, and to take other appropriate measures, to strengthen universal peace.

Three, to promote international cooperation.

In four, constitutes the centre for harmonizing the actions of nations, in order to achieve the common goal.

However the "United Nations" of these functions is" NATO" and the United States of America replaced. Of course, they did not perform" principles and purposes of the United Nations" since the war in Afghanistan has been led by the United States" NATO" group the world's rampant, have the overhead of a" United Nations", in the last year of the" war in Libya", the UN launched" Libya" fly. No doubt and bind the government hands, let the rioters arbitrary killings. Al-qaddafi had repeatedly asked to stop peace talks, but the United States and" NATO" say no to Al-qaddafi. A legitimate president as a terrorist organization, is now the United States with the intention of terrorist organization talks. Iraq is also. Said to have nuclear results did not, it is obvious to those who have the resources of small president as " NATO" service, if it is a dead-end, relative ratio" Somali" is a very poor country, often to pass by the people all over the world to bring great disaster. " NATO" why not to the above three countries as" Somali" solve the problem?

Now the United States and in the South Pacific form cliques armed those minions for their effectiveness, Japan's" relax three principles on arms exports" and SDF sea, these are the Japanese to the people of the world to do that, but they are not observed, and did not see the" United Nations" to mention a word.

Then the " United Nations" should be how? I think in the world if a national war against another country is the " United Nations" challenges," UN" should use their own power, the maximum reduction in the occurrence of war, any country has the right to decide on other countries to combat. When the two conflict" UN" should be the first to develop fair equality principle to restrict both sides. As the war in Iraq without a nuclear war was not punishment, then the world will have no axiom. " The United Nations" has lost a lot of control right, and so on a puppet. Over the past few years the "United Nations" contribution to the world is not, as the" United Nations " to all the staff I feel you choose a job like that is a disgrace, North riding in the "United Nations" head, waving a bullwhip, refers to the east to the west.

World giant Ahmadinejad and Chavez as the two mountain as strong, fear of rape, striving for autonomy, unlike those on the Pacific coast of military survival and the father. Japan's land is not big, population is two years, after the defeat of neighbours and not on strike. Terrorist organizations, although work is overdone, but much smaller than the war, many countries have some sense of justice, a space for one person to terrorist organizations, terrorist organizations should also have what demand and the United Nations to communicate, not to blindly terror.

In Iran and the North Korean nuclear issue, I think no matter who, no matter what the organization is not restricted in two or more countries develop nuclear pace, why? Because of the " Iraq" and" Libya" they see nuclear damn, seedless still damn, of course not nuclear. Investigate its reason and terrorist organization was born, is the United States of America headed " NATO" power overbearing, don't respect the natural result. The United States President rich beast, drugs from Afghanistan, Middle East terrorist organizations, military gorion's son, non-nuclear state president died, the turbulent state, the greatest trouble from" nato". The people of the world to the peace of the world, what do you do.

The United States does not change its beasts act terrorist kills more more, nuclear development country more, world disasters to the people more," NATO" doomsday is the real world peace begins. A battle in World War II, arrogant, and how to end. Respect the people of the world, respect for nature, it is the right way. Therefore I urge all over the world with a sense of the people, from all aspects of action, the disaster maker smash. The world will be in addition to their own things, not" NATO" backseat driver, there are people, lest the world into chaos, chaos to take advantage of them, is to" NATO" for the survival of the soil. A man betrayed National Father, rely on the military survival how far one can go?

To fight in the anti hegemony in recent years people pay tribute! And sacrifice in the NATO killed by people mourn, to be illegal sanctions and people's sympathy and support.

Chinese farmer was a world full

On 22 January 2012





2012年新年贺词“联合国的末日”
所谓“联合国”从文字的角度上讲应该是以世界和平为目标的机构。我们在看看“联合国的宗旨和原则”。
第一条,维持国际和平及安全。
二,发展国际间尊重人民平等权利及自决原则为根据之友好关系,并采取其他适当办法,以增强普遍和平。
三,促成国际合作。
四,构成协调各国行动之中心,以达成上述共同目的。
然而“联合国”的这些职能被“北约”和美国所代替。当然他们并不是执行“联合国的宗旨和原则”自阿富汗战争至今以美国为首的“北约”集团横行世界,已架空了“联合国”,在去年的“利比亚”战争中,联合国出台“利比亚”禁飞。无疑与绑住利政府的双手,让暴徒们任意打杀。卡扎菲曾多次要求停下来和谈,但美国及“北约”说卡扎菲没有诚意。一个合法的总统不如恐怖组织,现美有意与恐怖组织和谈。伊拉克同样。说有核结果没有,这明摆着是要那些有资源的小国总统为“北约”服务,如果不然就死路一条,相对比“索马里”是个非常贫穷的国家,经常给路过的各国人民带来很大灾难。“北约”为什么不像对上述三国那样解决“索马里”问题?
如今美国又在南太平洋拉帮结派武装那些走狗们为其效力,日本的“放宽武器出口三原则”和自卫队出海,这些都是日本人给世界人民做过保证的,但是他们今天不遵守,并没见“联合国”提过一个字。
那么“联合国”应该怎样呢?我认为在世界范围内如果一个国家对另一个国家开战就是对“联合国”的挑战,“联合国”应利用自己的权力,最大的减少战争的发生,任何国家无权决定对别国进行打击。当两国发生冲突时“联合国”应首先制定公平平等的原则来制约双方。如伊战无核发动战争的人得不到惩罚,那么世界就没有公理可言。“联合国”已丧失了很多控制权,如此下去形同傀儡。数年来“联合国”对世界的贡献不大,做为“联合国”的所有工作人员我感到你们选择那样的工作是一种耻辱,北约骑在“联合国”的头上,挥舞长鞭,指东打西。
世界巨人内贾德和查韦斯象两座大山一样坚强,不畏强暴,争取自主,不像太平洋沿岸那些靠军事养父生存与世。日本国土不大,人口不多,二战败后多年邻国并没有对其打击。恐怖组织虽然做事有些过头,但比发动战争要小的多,多少有些正义感,各国要给恐怖组织一席之地,恐怖组织也应该有什么诉求与联合国沟通,不要一味制造恐怖。
在伊朗和朝鲜核问题,我认为不管谁,不管什么组织是制约不了两国或更多国家发展核的步伐,为什么?因为“伊拉克”和“利比亚”他们看到有核该死,无核照样该死,当然不如有核而死。究其原因和恐怖组织的诞生,都是美国为首的“北约”强权霸道,不尊重自然的结果。美国盛产野兽总统多,阿富汗毒品多,中东恐怖组织多,军事养父的义子多,无核国家总统死的多,动荡的国家多,人类最大的烦恼来自“北约”。的多,要想世界和平世界人民你们说该怎么办。
美国不改其野兽行径恐怖组织越杀越多,核发展国更多,世界人民的灾难更多,“北约”的末日是世界真正和平的开始。一战,二战不可一世,最终又能怎样。尊重世界人民,尊重自然,才是正道。为此本人呼吁全世界有正义感的人民起来,从各个方面采取行动,把灾难制造者粉碎。世界各国会除理好自己的事,用不着“北约”指手画脚,有那么些人,唯恐天下不乱,乱中取利,他们就是给“北约”提供生存的土壤。一个人出卖民族,依靠军事养父生存的人能走多远?
借此向近年来战斗在反霸权的人们致以崇高的敬意!和牺牲在北约屠刀下的人民表示哀悼,向被非法制裁的国家和人民表示同情和支持。

中国农民 任世全
2012年元月22日
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Question • Score: 0 • Views: 1,785 • Replies: 0
No top replies

 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » 2012 New Year greetings" UN"(2012年新年贺词“联合国的末日”)
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 05:36:42