0
   

Getting Shot for Calling Women Ladies in London?

 
 
ehBeth
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 01:07 pm
I hate being referred to as a lady, unless the person knows me very well. I've ranted about it several times, most notably slowing down a round of golf a few years ago, while I was verbally pinning someone's ears back.

Ma'am - cringe.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 01:40 pm
You don't like being called "lady?"

I'll not forget . . . Yes Ma'am ! ! !



heeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehee . . .

okbye
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 04:09 pm
oldandknew wrote:
Well in all my years of living & working in London's film & TV industry, I've never heard any female objecting to being called WOMAN or LADY.
They might get the 'ump if you call then sweetheart, darling, love or dear.
I do tend to address check out girls for example as "love" & refer to barmaids as "the chick behind the jump".
But in a business situation, everyone regardless of gender or status is always addressed by the christian name.


Hmmmm - wondered if the story was a beat up.

I see no point in objecting to being referred to as "lady" in one off situations - you know, "have you served the lady in the green shirt" - "this lady wants a cordless drill, can you help her?" - no point biting people's heads off for no reason. I do think courtesy is important.

Nobody I actually spend time with uses it anyway. They would not dream of it, because of who they are- they have their own judgment about such things, and made the decision for themselves years ago.

Ma'am??? That is so seldom used here that it would make me smile - and blink! I would see no reason to object to it (though I would squirm inside) - unless it was somebody I was going to be relating with for any length of time - in which case I would just say call me Deb. I mean, if they are calling you ma'am they must be doing it to be polite.

It is difficult, in service industries, to know what to call people. I could never come at sir or madam - except very rarely - I used to just smile and not call them anything. I don't think you should snap at anyone who is just meaning to be polite.

Chick makes me want to be sick, but it is so universal again that I would object only if it was being used by someone to whom I was going to be close. Again, nobody I spend time with would use it.

Love and such differ, I think, in context.

If it is used to demean - calling women "love" and words like that have often been used deliberately here in some situations to attempt to put the woman you are speaking to in her place. I would object very strongly if it were used in that way - and did - but few people would try that one with me or any woman I know these days! If it is used by someone who means nothing by it, I would not have a problem.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 04:11 pm
Especially if they called everyone love, which in England they often seem to.
0 Replies
 
oldandknew
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 05:04 pm
yes, the term "love" is used in a friendly way in the UK. I've been called "love" by barmaids. It's similar to saying to a customer "have a nice day" as they leave the shop.
A great deal depends on how things are said, the context & intonation of the voice. It's no different to addressing a man as "mate", as in "'ere mate, how much does a 6 pack cost?"
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 06:23 pm
I agree - though I do think that language can be very important and I will object when I see a need to.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 06:27 pm
Setanta wrote:
Once when interviewing for jobs at Southern Illinios University, i responded to a question by the interviewer that i had asked the lady in the outer office . . . and was stopped cold while she began a rant about the word lady, and girl (which i had not used) and other terms which she implied i had used or would use, and the evils of a male-chauvanist-pig dominated society. I interviewed for several jobs at that time, and got a better one than that on offer in her department. No details, who, what and when are not the point. I later filed a formal complaint with the Vice President for Academic Affairs, and was informed that the lady in question would not be interviewing any more candidates for employment. I replied with my thanks, and offered the opinion that: "the lady in question may have been having a bad day." I copied her on that letter, i'm sure that sent her through the roof.


Well done, Setanta!
You've seen an example from you, which is obviously worth thinking Very Happy
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 07:38 pm
Hi dlowan, your reply is so long but my first impression is that the reply seems seeing through the inside of "lady", and I'm inspired.

I'm now re-reading it. LOL Very Happy
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jan, 2004 08:50 pm
After rereading Dlowan's reply, I think that history, politics, sociology, psycho ... and maybe including gossipology, are all concerned for the seemingly simple term "lady".

No more lady term for Australian women (but still, the courtesy term remains for US/Canadian women)Very Happy

Thank you, esteemed woman Dlowan!
0 Replies
 
Matt-79
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jan, 2009 02:20 pm
I think the problem is that women are referred to as "ladies" much more than men are referred to as "gentlemen". Although "lady" is in one sense a term of politeness in the same way as "gentleman", it is still used in many contexts where its male counterpart wouldn't be.

For instance, a group of young women would be called "ladies" by a doorman, yet he wouldn't call a group of young men "gentlemen" or "gents" - they would often be called "lads" which is of course a very informal term. Also, clubs and pubs have "ladies nights" that often feature a stripping act - you can hardly imagine the same kind of thing for men being called a "gents night". I have also seen signs that read "men's toilet" and "ladies toilet" - another example of unequal usage.
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.02 seconds on 05/16/2024 at 09:17:52