Twin Nested Hierarchy

Forums: Twin Nested Hierarchy, Science
Email this Topic • Print this Page

Any comments on this? My impression is that it's largely a political attempt to accomodate genetics with taxonomy. Similar things happen in my field where people try to accomodate QM and classical physics when there isn't really any need. QM is the rock star, and classical physics wants to bask in the same spotlight. Shrug. As an engineer classical physics remains much more useful to me even if the prevailing opinion is that QM is more phenomenological.

Anyway, I 'm not a biologist so I was looking for other opinions on Twin Nested Hierarchy.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 0 • Views: 582 • Replies: 1

No top replies

@Resha Caner,

Thanks for bringing my attention to the term. In biology, the argument seems to be about the genotype being a prior to the phenotype, or whether environmental niches result in evolutionary convergence of phenotypes. Since the domain is biology in which "functional" ("telelogical") explanation is acceptable, it is unlikely to be reflected in physics.

0 Replies

Forums
» Twin Nested Hierarchy

Read Discussion
Reply to All

Twin Nested Hierarchy

Quick Links

My Account

able2know