@boomerang,
The swan-song of Studebaker was the Studebaker Avanti, in the early 1960s. The Ford Mustang was a direct rip-0ff of the Avanti. The Studebaker company (then in its death throes), powered the Avanti with a 289 cu. in. engine, which in its final production model produced 240 horse power. By contrast, the 289 which Ford put in its Mustang developed only 210 hp. (Both figures are based on a single two-barrel carburetor.) The best engine production from Ford at that time was from the Windsor, Ontario, engine plant, and the 289 Windsor, with a four-barrel carburetor managed to produce 220 horse.
Studebaker's fuel-injected 289 produced 289 hp, one horse-power per cubic inch. I don't believe anyone ever matched that. There are Avanti fanatics in this country, but it is hard for them to assemble body parts to produce one, although it is still relatively easy for them to maintain the engine.
Ford will never admit it, but their incredible success with the Mustang (a model which is still in continuous production after 45 years) was thanks to the genius of the designers at Studebaker. Of course, Studebaker soon died of natural causes, so they could ignore the truth of the matter. The Studebaker also offered seat belts as standard equipment when no other cars did so, as well as a built-in roll bar, and was the first mass-produced American car to use disc brakes.