Lets applaud David

Forums:
Email this Topic • Print this Page

I've noticed that David has, more and more, incorporated American-English into his posts and has drastically reduced his usage of colour making some of his posts almost readable, everyone please stand for this humble ovation as we celebrate.

Topic Stats
Top Replies
Link to this Topic

Type: Discussion • Score: 9 • Views: 646 • Replies: 12

No top replies

@dyslexia,

I really cant stand David

1 Reply

@farmerman,

farmerman wrote:

I really cant stand David

your point is?

2 Replies

@dyslexia,

What part of "I , REALLY, CANT, STAND, DAVID"

dont you understand?
, perhaps I can help you .

0 Replies

@dyslexia,

Really, dyslexia. His point is as clear as "I never liked farmerman."

And I, too, appreciate David's increased efforts to communicate effectively.

0 Replies

@dyslexia,

David made it clear that he supports phonetic spelling and follows through on that with his posts on A2K.

I like it when somebody makes the extra effort to follow through on their principles, so I hope David continues to use phonetic spelling in his posts. Since most of his posts are quite brief, his use of different font sizes and colors in his posts does not, I feel, render them unclear.

4 Replies

@Blickers,

Quote:

most of his posts are quite brief

Many of David's posts have been quite lengthy, actually. Often posted one after the other to the same thread/s ... and a bugger to understand in the past. So plainer English is most welcome!

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

David made it clear that he supports phonetic spelling and follows through on that with his posts on A2K.

I like it when somebody makes the extra effort to follow through on their principles, so I hope David continues to use phonetic spelling in his posts. Since most of his posts are quite brief, his use of different font sizes and colors in his posts does not, I feel, render them unclear.

Perhaps you could volunteer to translate for us since you seem to fully understand David in your short time here.

0 Replies

http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k51/cjhsa/dys.jpg

0 Replies

omSigDAVID is amung myFavorite People.

How dare u criticise this erudite man? He will SHOOT u! R u now satisfied?

So stipulated.

0 Replies

@Blickers,

This joker spells they as "thay." Perhaps you can explain to me how that is any more (or less) phonetic an innovation. We've been down the garden path with this joker on his "fonetic" spelling again and again, its flaws and its drawbacks. It's a conceit, and nothing more.

0 Replies

@Blickers,

Blickers wrote:

David made it clear that he supports phonetic spelling and follows through on that with his posts on A2K.

I like it when somebody makes the extra effort to follow through on their principles, so I hope David continues to use phonetic spelling in his posts. Since most of his posts are quite brief, his use of different font sizes and colors in his posts does not, I feel, render them unclear.

The problem with phonetic spelling is that the rest of the world doesn't write that way. So far, at least. And it makes for difficult reading for those of us who don't, so it's annoying. I never read his stuff because I can't be bothered to translate it into English spelling. I figure if he wants to communicate with a largely non-phonetic world, he would write so we could easily understand him.

Question: How are you going to spell "their, there, and they're" - all three the same way?

0 Replies

How does one distinguish wood and would in I'mSickDavid's use of "wud?

Cud is actually a word, but he uses it for could (which is not remotely pronounced in that manner).

I did want to say, though, that the tag "tard bashing" really, really cracks me up . . .

0 Replies

Forums
» Lets applaud David

Read Discussion
Reply to All

Lets applaud David

Quick Links

My Account

able2know