@Cycloptichorn,
That'd be my guess - which, like you said (or was it OE?), just leaves the question why they do such a lousy job of it! They cant really think these snippets of incoherent ranting are going to persuade anyone, can they?
There's, like, a seriously cohesive case against Georgia and for the Ossetians to be made, for example - one I would passionately disagree with, but that might well win over many onlookers. This is obviously not it. Weird.
Then again, I read some article about the PUMA's (the bitter Hillaristas who never gave up), and turned out that at their recent super-secret meeting, one of the main items on the agenda was "Leveraging the progressive blogosphere. Past-present-future." I saw that and remembered the endless numbers of all-caps, hateful, incoherent rants by a band of devoted, self-identified PUMAs in the comments section of various blogs and news sites, which I'd always laughingly dismissed as the ravings of some seriously overboard individuals who were just discrediting themselves in the process. And suddenly realised: could they actually be doing this in a concerted fashion and believing it to be a
strategy?
You wouldnt think the FSB would be as delusionary as the PUMAs though. Maybe it's a team of patriotic Abkhaz students at the University of Sukhumi?