I found this picture accidentally

Where'd you accidentally find it? And it's not porn, it's innocence.

1. Why would anyone consider it pornographic?
2. Why, if you thought it was, would you post a link?
3. Stay away from my kids.

Hi Victor, there is nothing sexual about that picture. Anyone who thinks otherwise should seek help.

thank you

I asked able2know to remove the post.

I don't find it objectionable at all.

But I'm really curious about why, if you did, and you reported it, you also chose to draw so much attention to it?

And if you're concerned, why you linked to it with the title "child porno," so now people searching for that term will go straight to the photo (as opposed to whatever the actual title is -- "kids watering flowers," or whatever).

I dont know what I was thinking. I'm trying to get the post removed.

Fair enough.

I don't know what I'm thinking about half the time so I understand.

If anything, I think maybe the parents didn't think it through enough when posting that image up for anyone to find.

It's innocent and sweet, but possibly if you are concerned and it's from an easy to access place - you could just message the grown ups and tell them your concern. ?

It's their call but to call it porno is a bit 'out there' if you know what I mean. I doubt that was the intention of whoever posted it.

But I do get concerned when I see people posting stuff like that with their kids online. I question what they are thinking.

I'm quite sure the "real" child porno is pretty damn well hidden and you'd need special access and to be a seasoned perv to be allowed into that club. But what in the hell do I know.

I was told the thread was closed but I see it's still online. Why?

LCE-770544]: FROM: Victor Murphy POST: 3230052
InboxX

Thank you for reporting that post. We appreciate your taking the time to assist us in our moderation of Able2Know.

Sincerely,

The Support Team at www.able2know.org

Ticket Details
Ticket ID: LCE-770544
Department: Moderators
Priority: Low
Status: Closed

The ticket was closed Not the thread. Obviously the moderators dont feel the thread need to be closed.

Perhaps this will teach you (and others) to think a little longer before posting.

ok, I'm going to voice my thoughts here.

First, I have never seen pictures of child pornography, but I would guess those pictures are not only those of children engaging in explicit sex acts.

Take for instance, typical pictures of women posed naked, not in the "artsy" sense, but with the intent to arouse, even though no genital are exposed, or no sex acts being done.

That's not strictly pornography in my mind, but it's somewhat pornographic, if that makes sense The line is blurred. For someone not interested in becoming aroused, at least at that moment, the picture of the woman may be simply beautiful. Or, for someone else, it can cause arousing thoughts, and perhaps they will seek out further pictures, perhaps more explicit.

I feel that is the case in the picture of the children. Especially the girl on the right.

In my opinion, this girl is too old to be photographed in the nude. The boy on the left, I feel is at the borderline age.

Do I think like a pervert? Well, yes, I suppose I do. In the case of child safety, I believe that's a very good thing to be able to do.

If a ped saw those pictures, would he become aroused? Wouldn't surprise me a bit.

nick said anyone finding something sexual about this picture should seek help....very true. I believe a ped would find more than one thing sexual about this picture, and they should indeed seek help.

I don't think a pair of underwear or bathing suit on those kids would have hurt the innocence of that picture one bit.

I agree..but.. I wanted to add-

It isnt about when children are at the age of not being photographed nude, or allowed to PLAY in the nude.. ( unless it is obviously puberty time..or the kid just says no..)

it is about putting it on the internet so that people who are hunting for naked kids can find it..

Parents love their kids.. and want to share their lives with their family and friends.. yet dont stop to think about how often people are looking for photos of naked children.

I have photos like this of jillian.
They never leave my removable hard drive. They are private family photos.
Not for every sicko to dig up.

you're right shewolf.

I'm thinking, a person may find it fine to have their kids of that age play in the nude in your backyard, pool area, in the house.

However, would they let that child play on the front lawn in that state?

If they knew there was a registered ped in their neighborhood, would they let their child play, even in the backyard, surrounded by hedges, in the nude?

Being naked is natural. When I come home from work, the first thing I do is get out of my damn clothes. Am I being sexual? No. Do I do it with the curtains wide open? No. Because someone who say me could take it that way, even though I'm doing nothing more than walking around my house.

BTW, usually a loose robe gets put on fairly quickly, just for comfort, so don't you pervs get any ideas.

it depends..

If , for example, we had a back yard like my mother in laws.. Yes. Jillian could run around naked to her little hearts content.

You can see anything


We dont know what this entire yard looks like from the photograph.

They may have very well had a large fence around the property and no one, unless using a ladder or something else deliberate.. could see them.

We dont know.

But, as parents, I would think, they would be a bit more concerned with how easily people can find photos of their naked kids.

BUt.. on the flip side.. you can not really spend your entire life worrying about what people THINK.
Just because a child perp finds this photo and finds it sexy does not mean there is any harm done to the child.
In fact, no one will ever know..
So what if the perp is all happy with the photo.. ( yuck...)
No one will EVER know..