1
   

DSM on a2k

 
 
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:12 pm
Just curious, avoiding the obviously simply stupid, how many regular members of a2k do you think are psychotic under the definitions of the DSM? I'm guessing about 6 to 10.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 611 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:28 pm
I would guess, about 68%.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:31 pm
actually I'm thinking very few posters are actually psychotic. I think the ones I mostly dislike are just stupid.
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:33 pm
You mean 6 out of 10.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:35 pm
CalamityJane wrote:
You mean 6 out of 10.
No, not really, I'm thinking there are only about 6 to 10 really psychotic posters (mostly the ones that think sex with children is ok)
0 Replies
 
CalamityJane
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:39 pm
Oh, you mean the hard cases. Yes, I am actually glad that there aren't
many more of this kind.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:41 pm
I guess I missed those threads. I agree that they have to be psychotic to think such thoughts about children.
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:46 pm
I guess I'm just acronymly-challenged, not stupid or psychotic...


What does DSM stand for?
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:48 pm
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

(hadda look 'er up)
0 Replies
 
Butrflynet
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 05:53 pm
Ah, thanks Reg. Took me awhile to figure out what the overused MSM stood for. Figured DSM must have been something similar such as Down Stream Media. Wink
0 Replies
 
Intrepid
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 06:09 pm
edgarblythe wrote:
I guess I missed those threads. I agree that they have to be psychotic to think such thoughts about children.


Ditto. However, I think they have to be more than psychotic to have those thoughts. It is beyond my comprehension.
0 Replies
 
Aa
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 11:25 pm
There was a time, around the last one-third of the 1900s, when homosexuality was classified in the DSM as a mental disorder of some kind. That is no longer the case.

But extrapolating from that dynamic, I wonder which mental disorders currently so classified in the DSM will in future be reclassified as normal behavior.
0 Replies
 
tinygiraffe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2007 11:31 pm
Aa wrote:
But extrapolating from that dynamic, I wonder which mental disorders currently so classified in the DSM will in future be reclassified as normal behavior.


and i wonder what normal behaviors will in the future be reclassified as mental disorders. good thing the far right doesn't write the dsm, or lack of patriotism (also known as thinking for yourself,) religious tolerance, and science would be classified as mental disorders.
0 Replies
 
Roberta
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 12:24 am
Psychotic is extreme. I can think of two (or three or four) I'd classify in this category. There are others that seem disturbed, but I don't think I'd classify them as psychotic.

Then you've got your run-of-the-mill meshuginas.

And, yes, the stoopids.
0 Replies
 
shewolfnm
 
  1  
Reply Wed 24 Oct, 2007 06:33 am
Re: DSM on a2k
dyslexia wrote:
Just curious, avoiding the obviously simply stupid, how many regular members of a2k do you think are psychotic under the definitions of the DSM? I'm guessing about 6 to 10.



it truly depends on which way they vote
0 Replies
 
 

 
  1. Forums
  2. » DSM on a2k
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.02 seconds on 05/08/2024 at 02:28:33