Reply
Tue 16 Oct, 2007 09:34 am
More often than not "Let's agree to disagree" is a nice way of dealing with somebody you're sure is wrong. (It's nicer than "That's stupid.")
I p[refer "Let's agree to agree".... as long as I'm the one being agreed with....
hehe. more often than not, it's probably dishonest and patronizing.
regardless of how it's usually expressed at the moment, it's not an idea we should throw away.
You don't have to say "That's stupid"
The other day I told someone (maybe George) "That's retarded"
I feel that went over much better.
i never liked agreeing to disagree...
How did Phoenix manage to take over Dyslexia's A2K account?
Region Philbis wrote:i never liked agreeing to disagree...
That's because you're disagreeable.
I would much rather be nasty and provocative. That is much more interesting than making nice-nice.
Garn, yer as nice as pie.
Phoenix32890 wrote:dlowan wrote:Garn, yer as nice as pie.
Yeah, but you don't know what I am thinking! 
Yer just wike a wittle fwuffy bunny wabbit.
[size=7]Don't blow my cover. I want to be thought of as a big bad broad![/size]
Re: agree to disagree
dyslexia wrote:More often than not "Let's agree to disagree" is a nice way of dealing with somebody you're sure is wrong. (It's nicer than "That's stupid.")
No no no. Chew his ass and lecture him. Go on and on for several posts at least.
it always pays to be MISTER NICE GUY . just have a look >>>
Region Philbis wrote:d.wabbit wrote:Region Philbis wrote:i never liked agreeing to disagree...
That's because you're disagreeable.
am not
Now you are disagreeably essaying irony.
Stop it, I love it....
Why does everyone HATE the police?
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace