Mon 14 Dec, 2009 08:44 am - My best guess (if we're talking about human offspring, here): [b]age[/b].
If we're talking a subtle equivocation (which riddles are given to), and the latter "kid" refers... (view)
Mon 14 Dec, 2009 08:33 am - Well ...
You don't need a [i]glove[/i] to [i]catch[/i], but some people can't [i]catch[/i] without a [i]glove[/i].
That's my best guess, anyway. (view)
Mon 14 Dec, 2009 08:13 am - "Conductor" can mean an orchestra conductor.
(It's not an answer, just something I'm tossing out for brainstorming purposes.) (view)
Wed 2 Sep, 2009 08:25 am - Oh, don't worry, FreeDuck, most of this "conversation" wasn't even necessary to begin with, so I totally sympathize with you.
Let's face it, it's not math that... (view)
Wed 2 Sep, 2009 06:57 am - Perhaps I should clarify for the sake of closure ...
My explanation serves as a good starting point because it provides a grounding of exponents whilst establishing a key link between exponents,... (view)
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 08:18 pm - I don't disagree with you about the need for the establishment of a deeper understanding. What I disagree on is how one would go about doing so ... I never claimed my mini theorem would... (view)
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 07:35 pm - It has yet to give you any insight, that much is apparent. But I ought not have to worry about you, seeing as you supposedly have the credentials to make pronouncements like that. I feel so humbled... (view)
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 06:37 pm - Well, that is certainly interesting; a user who lays claim to being an educator who finds the idea that a language having rules is less than absolutely necessary. Since mathematics is nothing more... (view)
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 02:43 pm - Your argument stems from a basic misunderstanding of the identity property, so I shall treat it properly.
Although that statement "remains the same" is true, it doesn't disprove... (view)
Tue 1 Sep, 2009 01:43 pm - Wrong. That is equivalent to saying that you don't have one of a quantity, or in other words, without the 1, the whole number disappears. You can't get around the identity property no... (view)
