Tue 1 Feb, 2011 12:52 pm - Thanks, Joe. I think you've cleared up most of my misconceptions and given some solid foundation to others that didn't make sense.
Of course, I'd totally overlooked the... (view)
Tue 1 Feb, 2011 11:32 am - Joe, first of all let me thank you for your very informative replies to my queries, some of which have truly given me better options upon which to tailor my plot. The complex restrictions of... (view)
Tue 1 Feb, 2011 07:46 am - Thank you, Setanta. This posting was highly informative on the period and although I cannot use the Reform Act crisis, you have made some salient points that will help me in other parts of my... (view)
Tue 1 Feb, 2011 05:49 am - Thank you for pointing out my misconception, Setanta. I was indeed ignorant of King William's 7-year reign sandwiched between George IV (alias the Prince Regent) and Victoria. I am not a... (view)
Tue 1 Feb, 2011 04:33 am - Setanta, your input further confirms to me the salient factor I put forward in the first part of my reply to Joe in Chicago. I couldn't make out how the escheating process occurred when an... (view)
Tue 1 Feb, 2011 04:06 am - QUOTE: Well, I'm not sure "fee simple absolute in possession" is the correct technical term. A peer could always own property in fee simple absolute just by buying or inheriting... (view)
Mon 31 Jan, 2011 08:21 am - I have been following your postings on this thread and hope to get your expert legal view for my last posting in reply to Setanta's further below. Setanta recommended you to me as being... (view)
Mon 31 Jan, 2011 07:47 am - Yes, I did figure a way of becoming a member of this forum. But, no, I wasn't advised by email notice that I got your reply. Luckily, I found my way back by accident through further... (view)
Mon 3 Jan, 2011 04:37 am - A congratulatory note to Setanta ... I, too, am doing some research for a historical novel and came across your reply to the person who posed the question. I must say I've learnt more from... (view)
