Sun 13 Jul, 2008 05:29 am - [quote="real life"]
Does science EVER include the supernatural of any description or definition?
I would have thought the answer was NO. [/quote]
Jesus, "real life",... (view)
Fri 11 Jul, 2008 01:02 pm - And yes, "real life", see the topic of this thread. We all know that you're foisting this nonsense so you can pretend that science is comparable to creationism, as in just a matter... (view)
Fri 11 Jul, 2008 12:56 pm - In case you're preparing to lie to me yet again, "real life", here's one of your summaries of your points, not too long ago:
"It's supernatural by definition. Deal... (view)
Fri 11 Jul, 2008 12:53 pm - [quote="real life"]You imply that I use two different definitions to refer to the same thing. This is false. [/quote]
Nope, it's quite true. You seek to apply your misapplied,... (view)
Thu 10 Jul, 2008 08:35 am - "real life", "sir", you skipped half my reply and have yet to deal with the basic reality of your equivocation. You know it's there: you admit to using two different... (view)
Tue 8 Jul, 2008 04:59 pm - [quote="real life"][quote="Shirakawasuna"][quote="real life"]You (and parados) want to gloss over a complete lack of evidence as being simply 'unknown'.... (view)
Thu 3 Jul, 2008 01:20 am - aperson: sorry for misinterpreting you, I thought that might be the case yet for some reason just leaving what I said up there seemed like the best thing to do ;). (view)
Wed 2 Jul, 2008 01:33 pm - [quote="neologist"] Agreed, insomuch as the standard for evidence, as expected by Wilso, cannot be met.
Yet, I continue to believe in the creator for other evidentiary... (view)
Wed 2 Jul, 2008 01:30 pm - [quote="real life"] Alright, let's wrap this up.
You can't say 'It is an unknown' until you have determined that there is an 'It' to discuss. [/quote]... (view)
Wed 2 Jul, 2008 01:25 pm - [quote="real life"][quote="Shirakawasuna"]
..........(Setanta) clarified........[/quote]
He 'clarified', eh?
No, what he did was deny the import of... (view)
