Sat 7 Nov, 2009 05:43 pm - Let's suppose for a moment that the Federal system takes the most comprehensive state coverage and requires it for all states. It would be the federal mandate you agree with. Would you go... (view)
Sat 7 Nov, 2009 11:38 am - So... you want a Federal mandate that tells insurance companies what kind of coverage they have to offer in their policies...
Isn't that Federal health care and what they are trying to do now? (view)
Sat 7 Nov, 2009 11:21 am - [quote]Seeing you mentioned it, how many rockets is that ?[/quote]
Let' see.. A rocket either blows up or it doesn't....
According to Ionus that would be 50/50.
(view)
Sat 7 Nov, 2009 11:12 am - [quote="Thomas"]
It ends in a world where the law takes our freedom to drive on the left side of the road. Oh wait, we're already in that world -- and there's nothing wrong... (view)
Sat 7 Nov, 2009 11:11 am - [quote="Thomas"]
Parados -- In your opinion, would there be a problem with cross border competition as long as states can still enforce their minimum standards on "imports"?... (view)
Sat 7 Nov, 2009 11:01 am - [quote] they also make it more expensive because mandates require insurers to pay for care consumers previously funded out of their own pockets.[/quote]
It makes it more expensive for who?
If... (view)
Fri 6 Nov, 2009 06:04 pm - ...and South Dakota did for credit card interest rates. (This was already mentioned and ignored.)
Prior to the Feds requiring states to accept cards from other states, states had their own usury... (view)
Fri 6 Nov, 2009 06:00 pm - [quote="cicerone imposter"]
Minimum standards are common across the US; it's what you pay and get for your money that's the issue.
[/quote]
The minimum standard for car... (view)
Fri 6 Nov, 2009 05:53 pm - [quote="cicerone imposter"]
Minimum standards are common across the US; it's what you pay and get for your money that's the issue.
[/quote]
So then tell us what specific... (view)
