Thu 18 Dec, 2003 12:45 pm - Yes, quite true fresco. But my point is that if our reasoning doesn't reflect our observations, it most likely doesn't correspond with reality. (view)
Thu 18 Dec, 2003 05:14 am - [quote]Thought can be observed, but it cannot be said to be anything except the observation (of it), i.e. thought cannot be said to be any kind of material, nor can it be distinguished from... (view)
Wed 17 Dec, 2003 06:18 pm - I am already aware of E=MC^2. I already used it before in this thread to explain my point. In that regard, you could say i am a monist. I never denied that what i believe wasn't monistic in a... (view)
Wed 17 Dec, 2003 04:08 pm - [quote]It isn?t a question that it ?needs? an observer, but rather that it doesn?t have one. If it doesn?t have one, if it is not being observed how can it be said to be matter/energy?
As long... (view)
Wed 17 Dec, 2003 02:51 pm - [quote]I would say the same to you ? based on the above. I.e.
What is observing these words?
Matter/energy.
What is observing the matter/energy observing these words?[/quote]
Why... (view)
Wed 17 Dec, 2003 01:44 pm - Since i believe the universe consists out of either matter or energy, i believe thoughts are also matter or energy or most likely a combination of both. It has to be noted that a biochemical... (view)
Mon 15 Dec, 2003 01:15 pm - Frank has a point. The important thing of a debate is how you present your arguments. Since this thread started, i've barely seen anything that was on topic. They merely commented on the way... (view)
Mon 15 Dec, 2003 10:59 am - Noah, like Frank said, clarify your post in one paragraph. Preferably with easy to understand words. Perhaps you can get this thread on topic again.
I did mention you had alot of guts, didn't... (view)
Mon 15 Dec, 2003 08:27 am - :shock: Whoa. I think you may have a point here and there, but i must say that you have guts to post this kind of topic. (view)
