24
   

What should be done about illegal immigration?

 
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jan, 2009 10:19 am
Illegals, children or not, do have some rights. However, they don't have the right to stay in this country, and may be expelled by the govt.
0 Replies
 
  2  
Reply Fri 9 Jan, 2009 10:22 am
We are an aging society, with fewer people paying into and more taking out of social security. This should encourage us to welcome all those young people from latin america who come to work for low wages and pay into our social security system. Oh, and the vast majority of them will never receive social security.
View Profile Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jan, 2009 10:28 am
We should be encouraging our own young people to get married and establish homes where communities are strengthened and stablilized and then have kids of their own. And yes, when there is full employment in the USA, we should and do welcome new immigrants that are interested in being Americans and helping it grow and become stronger. It does not strengthen America for people to come illegally, participate in identify theft, exacerbate the crime statistics, overload social services, work for substandard wages to the detriment of others, and be incapable of assimilating into the general culture. In my opinion, the staggering cost for this alone far exceeds the meager amounts that make their way into the social security system as the more productive illegals are not enough to counter that.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jan, 2009 10:43 am
How about this government fining the goverment that they came from, for the cost of shipping them back? Fining the companies that hire these illegals? They're also taken advantage of by unscrupulous employers that don't pay them? Those companies should be seized by the government too! I'll bet that will discourage the hiring and with no jobs, illegals will be begging to be sent back!
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Jan, 2009 11:34 pm
teenyboone wrote:


Quote:
How about this government fining the goverment
that they came from, for the cost of shipping them back?

We might have to go to war
to collect the fines; that can be expensive.


Quote:
Fining the companies that hire these illegals?

We discussed that already;
a question of scienter.



Quote:
They're also taken advantage of by unscrupulous employers
that don't pay them?

Maybe that 'll give them an incentive
to return to where that does not happen.



Quote:

Those companies should be seized by the government too!

That sounds unconstitutional to me; communistic.


Quote:
I'll bet that will discourage the hiring and with no jobs,
illegals will be begging to be sent back!

Instead of begging,
thay shoud return the same way that thay came.
0 Replies
 
View Profile au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 10:54 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/world/americas/05mexico.html?_r=1&ref=todayspaper

And the beat goes on.
View Profile Foxfyre
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 11:45 am
This is particularly disturbing Au.

In the mid to late 1980's when hubby and I were traveling most of the State of New Mexico (and part of Texas), we frequently overnighted in Las Cruces where hubby found a barber that he particularly liked. Guillermo was Mexican born and a recently naturalized American citizen and frequently chatted about his former life in Mexico, the problems with illegals who were becoming increasingly apparent in southern New Mexico, and what he thought the U.S. government should do about it. He was firmly convinced that the USA should simply annex Mexico and make it part of the USA. He was convinced that folks would start moving south in large numbers instead of north. He knew it would be a politically unpopular concept, but he honestly thought that it would be best for the USA, Mexico, and the Mexican people.

Setting aside our usual common condemnation of imperialistic aggression, can you read something like the NY Times article Au linked, and not have at least some sympathy for Guillermo's point of view?
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 11:45 am
Sounds like the robbers knew of this, why else rob an old man?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 11:54 am
I am a little upset. I just heard that Janet Napolitano, the future head of the Homeland Security Department, said that she is not sure that a fence works. Is she nuts? It has been highly effective in CA and in Israel. Good fences make good neighbors.
  3  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 11:55 am
Advocate wrote:
Good fences make good neighbors.


Sure: the GDR was our best friend.
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 12:33 pm
Foxfyre wrote:

This is particularly disturbing Au.

In the mid to late 1980's when hubby and I were traveling most of the State of New Mexico (and part of Texas), we frequently overnighted in Las Cruces where hubby found a barber that he particularly liked. Guillermo was Mexican born and a recently naturalized American citizen and frequently chatted about his former life in Mexico, the problems with illegals who were becoming increasingly apparent in southern New Mexico, and what he thought the U.S. government should do about it. He was firmly convinced that the USA should simply annex Mexico and make it part of the USA. He was convinced that folks would start moving south in large numbers instead of north. He knew it would be a politically unpopular concept, but he honestly thought that it would be best for the USA, Mexico, and the Mexican people.

Setting aside our usual common condemnation of imperialistic aggression, can you read something like the NY Times article Au linked, and not have at least some sympathy for Guillermo's point of view?
Pity you don't put more stock in Guillermo's point of view. He's right: Merging with Mexico would work to the mutual benefit of us all.

Watching our neighbors suffer obscenely through a fence is depraved.

In the mean time; an open border policy would encourage the majority of border crossers to check in and identify themselves, allowing Law Enforcement to concentrate on the criminals who couldn't/wouldn't comply.

Mindless bigotry and misguided selfishness is what maintains the status quo. This country is rife with the poorly informed who believe there is a finite amount of wealth to be had, and therefore believe denying another man a chance increases their own. This belief is as false as it is immoral.


View Profile JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 12:46 pm
Quote:
It has been highly effective in CA and in Israel. Good fences make good neighbors.


Advocate, those are hardly examples of good fences. Bush has been a much better fence, taking the economy to such a level that Wall Streeters are looking for work in Mexico, Dubai and Kuwait.
0 Replies
 
  3  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 12:51 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Advocate wrote:
Good fences make good neighbors.


Sure: the GDR was our best friend.
Amazing ignorance, eh, Walter. I guess he thinks everything is just dandy in Israel as well. Incredible.
0 Replies
 
View Profile au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 12:58 pm
While we are at it why not annex every country that cannot govern itself and get rid of borders inorder that they can come here to be supported by the American tax payer.
  3  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 01:03 pm
That would be one possibility.

But just getting rid of borders would be fine as well.
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 01:25 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:

That would be one possibility.

But just getting rid of borders would be fine as well.

PLEASE -- get rid of your own borders.
Leave OURS intact.





David
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 01:28 pm
Walter Hinteler wrote:

Advocate wrote:
Good fences make good neighbors.


Sure: the GDR was our best friend.

U LIKE being cozy with communism, right, Walter ?
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 01:37 pm
OmSigDAVID wrote:
U LIKE being cozy with communism, right, Walter ?


I suppose, I've got the wrong translation for 'cozy'. (Or you read a falsification of the story of my life. Wink )
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 01:50 pm
au1929 wrote:

While we are at it why not annex every country that cannot govern itself and get rid of borders inorder that they can come here to be supported by the American tax payer.
Annexation would allow American business and money to flow to where they're at and eliminate the need to move here. Migration would be a two-way street. But as Walter points out; this could be accomplished without annexation as well.
0 Replies
 
View Profile roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jan, 2009 02:02 pm
Au, where the hell you been, boy? People worry.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
So....Will Biden Be VP? - Question by blueveinedthrobber
Obama..... not religious? - Discussion by shewolfnm
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.81 seconds on 11/23/2009 at 09:53:48 Top End