1
   

Spirit of St Louis, if a fly is flying inside a plane....

 
 
  1  
Reply Thu 24 Apr, 2003 11:46 pm
No.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Dec, 2004 05:08 am
Equus wrote:
More importantly, does the flying fly contribute to the airplane staying aloft?


Actually, yes.

It kept Charlie awake.
0 Replies
 
View Profile neil
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Dec, 2004 05:54 am
Hi Satt: "ALWAYS implicitly assumed" Now I understand why so many non-engineers think alternative energy is cost effective. Neil
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 09:28 pm
I just started a thread on this and then was told there already was one.

I had heard this before and from what I remember, I was told that yes, the fly would add weight because even air inside the plane adds weight. Does that make sense?
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 09:55 pm
if the windows are open wouldn't the fly be sucked out of the plane and therefore his weight wouldn't be there?
0 Replies
 
View Profile dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 09:58 pm
How do you know it was a he?

Mebbe she was a she, and full of eggs?

Damned dumb bear!

Read the thread, Momma!
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 10:10 pm
dlowan wrote:
How do you know it was a he?

Mebbe she was a she, and full of eggs?

Damned dumb bear!

Read the thread, Momma!


omelet then....
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 22 Dec, 2005 10:40 pm
I guess I will have to read it again dlowan. I must have missed something.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 02:23 pm
satt_fs wrote:
Supposing windows open (!) and that the air flows smoothly through the plane, you cannot conclude that the fly adds its weight to the plane itself.


That must be one fast fly to keep up with a moving plane in midst of full airflow.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 02:34 pm
Momma Angel wrote:
I just started a thread on this and then was told there already was one.

I had heard this before and from what I remember, I was told that yes, the fly would add weight because even air inside the plane adds weight. Does that make sense?


Momma, your previous question on the other thread involved a "closed" plane, which has a relatively simple answer.

They are complicating this situation by proposing an open plane and a fly which is "in between" in some way.

The object of their question is to disturb the answer to the simple problem (of a closed plane) by making it less clear where the downdraft of the fly is primarily felt.

However, without going into the physics of forces, it seems to me that any fly which is keeping up with a plane is by necessity caught in an airmass which is moving with the plane, and therefor the fly still adds weight to the plane. If the fly becomes involved with an airmass which is not moving with the plane, then likewise it's weight will no longer be involved with the plane (and it will quickly lose sight of the plane).
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Sat 24 Dec, 2005 03:05 pm
Thank you Rosborne,

I did notice that "my" plane was closed and the other wasn't. I have been reading all of these posts with lots of interest. I'm not that great at science but I do find this all very interesting.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 3 Jan, 2006 07:37 pm
Illustration Question

A man rode up to the local feed store, bought a sack of feed, slung it on his shoulder, got back on his horse and rode off.

He allowed that it was easier on the horse that way Smile
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Global Warming: Credible or Incredible? - Discussion by Hazlitt
Black Hole Outbursts - Discussion by Rae
Incredible New Photos of the Sun - Discussion by sumac
WEATHER OR NOT? - Discussion by Misti26
Leonid Storm Tues 19th - Discussion by quinn1
Tonight's Shuttle Launch - Discussion by Rae
Did we really land on the Moon ? - Discussion by Algis Kemezys
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.34 seconds on 11/25/2009 at 05:16:33 Top End