2
   

What happened to Roanake survivors in 1587?

 
 
Janelle
 
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 11:05 am
I'm looking for the most recent archeological theories about what happened to the original Roanoke settlement. Was CROATOAN really the name of a near by island or some code that the settlers used?
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 2 • Views: 3,500 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
boomerang
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 11:07 am
I have no idea but I think your question is interesting so I'm going to stick around to see if anyone has any kind of answer for you.

Welcome to A2K, Janelle!
0 Replies
 
gustavratzenhofer
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 11:10 am
It is my understanding that the whereabouts of the settlers remains a mystery.

I'll be with boomer on this one. Watching and waiting.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 06:36 pm
These two books by David Quinn, historian at the University of Liverpool, England are the standards on this subject.

The Roanoke Voyages 1584-1590
David B Quinn editor 1991

Lost Colonists, Their Fortune, and Probable Fate
David B Quinn 1984
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 09:02 pm
This should be taken with salt from a murky memory--but here's the gossip:

Croatan was the name of a tribe that lived in the distant vicinity. It is alleged by some that this tribe came in and took them all, and they eventually blended in to the tribe.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 09:08 pm
OK--you made me curious, so I googled.

The Lumbee Indians lived on Croatan Island--present day Hattaras. They were on good terms with the colonists. When the resupply ship from England was delayed a couple of years, it is surmised that the colonists partnered up with the Indians willingly and married into the tribe.
0 Replies
 
LionTamerX
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 09:20 pm
Or they were slaughtered. If they had assimilated into the Lumbee culture, surely there would have been survivors. I suppose it's possible that they died off from disease.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Oct, 2005 09:54 pm
I can understand why you might think that, but there were no bodies found, and actually there were signs that English had intermarried in to the tribe---British surnames of many of the colonists among the Lumbees, Christianity...
0 Replies
 
KetchupLady
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 11:12 am
I remember learning about that a long time ago in US History, I thought it was interesting then, thanks for the research everyone. Learn something new everyday. Smile
0 Replies
 
Bi-Polar Bear
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 11:13 am
They drank the maize Kool Aid?
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 11:16 am
In fact, settlers in North Carolina in the 17th century reported meeting "Indians" with fair hair, and green and blue eyes. The log of the ship's master who was to have returned to "the Lost Colony," but who was delayed by Elizabeth's prohibition on shipping during the crisis with Spain recounts that Croatan was the name of the "chief" of the local tribe (in the tribes of the coastal bands of Viriginia and the Carolinas, no distinction was usually made between the name of the band and the name of the chief). The colonists had been told to call on Croatan at need. The carving of the name Croatan on the tree suggests that this is precisely what happened.
0 Replies
 
DESooner
 
  1  
Reply Mon 7 Nov, 2005 05:42 pm
Setanta beat me to it - most popular theory is that the colonists went to the local tribe for help and some research showed caucasian features included among those descendants of indigenous Indian tribes. Also - FWIW - current Oklahoma Men's Basketball Coach is Kelvin Sampson who is part Lumbee, and was born in North Carolina.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Dec, 2005 02:54 pm
Re: What happened to Roanake survivors in 1587?
Janelle wrote:
I'm looking for the most recent archeological theories about what happened to the original Roanoke settlement. Was CROATOAN really the name of a near by island or some code that the settlers used?


It was both.

If they had to leave the colony, they were to carve the name of their destination in a place where the carving would be found.

If they left because of an enemy threat, they were to also carve a cross above it.

As there was no cross with their carving, they moved to the island of Croatoan, in peace.

What happened to them after that is speculation.
0 Replies
 
Teperehmi
 
  1  
Reply Wed 18 Jan, 2006 05:29 pm
Years later
There was actually reports from future colonists who reported seeing white people amidst the Indians years later.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

HAPPY ANNIVERSARY, EVERYONE! - Discussion by OmSigDAVID
WIND AND WATER - Discussion by Setanta
Who ordered the construction of the Berlin Wall? - Discussion by Walter Hinteler
True version of Vlad Dracula, 15'th century - Discussion by gungasnake
ONE SMALL STEP . . . - Discussion by Setanta
History of Gun Control - Discussion by gungasnake
Where did our notion of a 'scholar' come from? - Discussion by TuringEquivalent
 
  1. Forums
  2. » What happened to Roanake survivors in 1587?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/23/2024 at 02:37:48