1
   

Revenge of the Threadkillers

 
 
View Profile Lady J
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:09 pm
Grand Duke wrote:
Lady J - I will, but not got time till later today.


Thank you Grand Duke. I could do it myself, but for some reason now it feels like a "grade" in school and I can't wait to see the results of my efforts!
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:10 pm
out of 1,489 posts
I have the last post on 127 of them.

hmm..using my calculator i am getting like 1891.2 %

HUH?
i am no good at math I tell ya..
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 01:11 pm
It's only 8.5%, shewolf. No record!
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 03:14 pm
>sigh<
maybe I need to try harder.. heheh
0 Replies
 
View Profile JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 03:47 pm
9.8% with many on the earliest few pages. Hmmmm, I'd like to know the percentage of gnat posts I've had. I could be the winner there.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 03:59 pm
<pokes thread with stick>

Still moving?
0 Replies
 
View Profile roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 06:22 pm
I saw the title of this one, and thought "Oh boy, a literary discussion. Hey, I can talk about that old Pern series from Anne McCaffery."
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 06:26 pm
Someone check my stats. I'm too lazy.
0 Replies
 
View Profile Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:08 pm
Roger--

Old Pern series?

The McCaffrey mantle has been passed to Todd, son and heir.
0 Replies
 
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:10 pm
I am sure my thread-kill stats are pretty high.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:12 pm
You would probably have the record, littlek, but I always come along after you, post some inane rubbish, and you are thus saved from having an extraordinarily high thread kill percentage.
0 Replies
 
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:13 pm
You're so kind.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:17 pm
i started on p.5 of my posts.
157 kills outta 1027 threads, for a so-so 15.3%...
0 Replies
 
View Profile Noddy24
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:19 pm
I think my statistics would be unflattering for my ego. Therefore, I choose to focus my eyes elsewhere.
0 Replies
 
View Profile littlek
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 08:20 pm
I think it's more fair to peruse your thread participated in ("Your Posts") rather than threads started ("Your Topics").

The first two pages of "My Topics" I ended 47 threads and others' ended 53.
The first two pages of "My Posts" I had 100 threads ended by others and 10 ended by me.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 09:16 pm
I looked at my posts, mid my many, er, thousands, but only four pages, one of which had a nifty high kill rate. That must have been a bad or good week. I think I need a bigger sample.. perhaps tomorrow.
0 Replies
 
View Profile DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 09:18 pm
I think we need Craven on this.
0 Replies
 
View Profile roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 09:39 pm
That's the one, Noddy, and I believe she was friends and more or less neighbors with the woman who wrote The Book of Kells. McAvoy, I believe it was.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 10:01 pm
Lady J wrote:
Thank you Grand Duke. I could do it myself, but for some reason now it feels like a "grade" in school and I can't wait to see the results of my efforts!


Lady J - 102 kills in 731 threads = 14% (not a bad score at all)

(I'm going to compile a scoreboard in my opening post...)
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 27 Jul, 2005 10:17 pm
ossobuco wrote:
Okey dokey. I looked up four sequential pages from July 2004. You do that, if you don't know, by going to My Posts, clicking on page 2, looking at the url, and then changing the number at the end, where there is a t=.....
In my case I changed it to 2000.
So - I could be pretty sure those threads are quite dead, in contrast to more recent ones.

I got totals of 7/50, 16/50, 9/50, 6/50. A gobsmacking 19%.
Killer Osso.


All right, I looked at six more pages for a total of 500 posts.
Using these previous pages (41-44), I got a subtotal of 38, and in the next six (45-50), a subtotal of 38, total for 500 being 76, or 15.2%

Well, that's better (down from 19%). There was one page with (16), and one page with (1), with the rest around 6-8.
0 Replies
 
 

 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 11/27/2009 at 07:30:55 Top End