1
   

questions about permission

 
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 Jun, 2005 08:52 am
Thanks JTT
0 Replies
 
View Profile JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 13 Jun, 2005 05:04 am
navigator wrote:
Thanks JTT


You're welcome, Navigator.

One small point. I don't want to leave you with the impression that 'may' or 'could' are not to be used in language. Actually, in language, it's always better to err on the side of caution/politeness.

'could' is used a lot for permission, even in family situations where one would think such politeness wouldn't be necessary.

If you have the slightest notion that a situation requires some degree of politeness, it doesn't hurt to try and be more polite.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 16 Jun, 2005 02:02 am
Thanks my friend, you are leaving me with a good impression :wink:
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Thu 23 Jun, 2005 02:41 am
I'm talking now about ability with can and be able. Should I right this here

?! Ok, when speaking about ability we must use can or be able ( including

could and was/ were able in the past ,and other forms ) and nothing else,

right? . If I say,

Our kid shall/ will be able to walk within weeks.

Is it the only way to express future?, And what would shall and will

respectively imply?

Let's take could+ perfect infinitive, this is used for past ability, and for

non-performed action, example,

I could have taken her there. But, I didn't

Also, when we aren’t sure if the action was performed or not, example,

He could have sent a message.

Is there a difference between the two sentences below,

-I could have taken her there

I was able to take her there.

-He could have sent a message.

He was able to send a message.

Also, if I say,

He could have told me. This means irritation or reproach over something,

but does this also mean not performed action like the above?

THanks everybody.

I hope I'm not confusing anyone .
0 Replies
 
View Profile Letty
 
  1  
Reply Fri 1 Jul, 2005 05:55 am
At this moment, navigator, we are wondering if you are still with us. Later, we will try and cover your questions.
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 03:33 am
Hi Letty, I'm with you as much as I could. It's true that I'm busy here, but

this never keep me from learning with you guys, it's fun Cool
0 Replies
 
View Profile Letty
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Jul, 2005 06:49 am
Well, navigator. Just glad to know that you are still out and about. <smile>
0 Replies
 
  1  
Reply Wed 6 Jul, 2005 01:25 am
If I say, " you mustn't repeat that". Now, I know that must not means a

negative obligation. It also expresses an emphatic advice. What does it

mean here? I wonder if this sentence implies any meaning of offence!

Also, can " need " as a semi modal be in affirmative form?, I read it can't

be except in one condition.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
what's the meaning of the sentence? - Question by grace-g
meaning of second paragraph - Question by tanguatlay
Affect vs. Effect. - Discussion by Anonymous
English is a messed up language... - Discussion by Monger
Jumping Jehosaphat - Discussion by Equus
What's Your No. 1 Grammar Pet Peeve? - Discussion by dupre
Why it takes awhile to understand English!! - Discussion by the reincarnation of suzy
present perfect - Discussion by bmo
 
Copyright © 2009 Horizontal Verticals :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 11/28/2009 at 10:53:14 Top End